IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v27y2024i2p313-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aligning redundancy and flexibility for supply chain resilience: a literature synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaojun Yang
  • Mengdi Wu
  • Jun Sun
  • Yali Zhang

Abstract

Redundancy and flexibility are important key drivers for achieving supply chain resilience. However, there is a lack of comparison between these two elements, and their effectiveness on supply chain resilience, as well as how their relationship affects it. To address these problems, this study synthesizes the literature on supply chain resilience, redundancy, and flexibility, and clarifies specific strategies for aligning redundancy and flexibility for supply chain resilience in practice. In particular, it identifies the dimensions of redundancy and flexibility, and delineates four supply chain statuses: vulnerable, robust, lean, and resilient. The understanding leads to a supply chain resilience management framework, which provides operational guidance for enterprises to evaluate supply chain vulnerability and improve operation status. Overall, the framework contributes to the literature with the roles that redundancy and flexibility play in achieving supply chain resilience in terms of their manifestations and interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaojun Yang & Mengdi Wu & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang, 2024. "Aligning redundancy and flexibility for supply chain resilience: a literature synthesis," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 313-335, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:2:p:313-335
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2024.2328196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2024.2328196
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2024.2328196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:27:y:2024:i:2:p:313-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.