IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jgsmks/v30y2020i1p34-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family life cycle and the life course paradigm: A four-country comparative study of consumer expenditures

Author

Listed:
  • Randall Shannon
  • Thuckavadee Sthienrapapayut
  • George P. Moschis
  • Thorsten Teichert
  • Betul Balikcioglu

Abstract

Marketers and academics have long been trying to develop effective segmentation models such as several versions of the family life cycle (FLC), which predicts behavior based on stages people are expected to sequentially experience during their lives. However, stage-based factors have been found poor predictors of consumer behavior, and assumptions held by the FLC model fall short of reality. Despite limitations inherent in family life cycle models and recent developments in other disciplines that have resulted in the replacement of the term “life cycle” with the more continuous concept of the “life course,” marketers are yet to capitalize on such recent developments for improving FLC models. This study shows how the traditional FLC model can be improved by incorporating variables from the life course paradigm (LCP). Although the databases employed do not permit the development of refined FLC stages for testing various assumptions derived from the LCP, the paper provides a “sensitizing” framework for thinking how to improve efforts to study consumers at different FLC stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Randall Shannon & Thuckavadee Sthienrapapayut & George P. Moschis & Thorsten Teichert & Betul Balikcioglu, 2020. "Family life cycle and the life course paradigm: A four-country comparative study of consumer expenditures," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 34-44, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:30:y:2020:i:1:p:34-44
    DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2019.1613913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21639159.2019.1613913
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21639159.2019.1613913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:30:y:2020:i:1:p:34-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RGAM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.