IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intjhp/v20y2020i3p344-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing options for older people in a reimagined housing system: a case study from England

Author

Listed:
  • David Robinson
  • Stephen Green
  • Ian Wilson

Abstract

The housing options of older people now extend far beyond the traditional choice between staying put and making do, or moving to specialist housing or residential care. A flexible suite of options has emerged, centred on promoting independence and well-being. Valuable insights have been provided into the development, delivery, costs and benefits of these options. Light has also been cast on the experiences and preferences of older people. However, little is known about who gets what housing, where and why. This reflects a tendency within analysis to consider these different housing options in isolation. This study responds by situating the housing options of older people within wider debates about the reimagining of the housing system driven by the neoliberal transformation in housing politics. Taking a case study approach, it explores the gap between the ambitions of policy and realities of provision at the local level, relates this to the particular intersection of state practices and market mechanisms manifest within the case study and, in doing so, rises to the challenge of extending analysis of the impacts of the neoliberal approach on the right to housing to new groups and different settings.

Suggested Citation

  • David Robinson & Stephen Green & Ian Wilson, 2020. "Housing options for older people in a reimagined housing system: a case study from England," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 344-366, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:20:y:2020:i:3:p:344-366
    DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2019.1644020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19491247.2019.1644020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19491247.2019.1644020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intjhp:v:20:y:2020:i:3:p:344-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.