IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/hbhfxx/v25y2024i2p151-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Those Who Learn from History Are Doomed to Repeat It

Author

Listed:
  • Frank J. Fabozzi
  • K. C. Chen
  • K. C. Ma
  • Ramesh Rao

Abstract

We see the stock market constantly responding to changing signals. These inputs are perceived to be highly structured in both space and time. Such regularities in the environment allow expectations about the future to be formed, facilitating current investment decisions. Perceiving the continuous stability is exploited by the brain, creating a bias in perception to generate serial dependence. Therefore, stock price dependence may be simply a result of the behavioral dependence in the decision process. The empirical evidence presented in this paper confirms that the dependence in every facet of an investment decision process has contributed to the observed stock price dependence. The largest contributor is by far from investors’ memory dependence, exceeding 80%. If history is the record of past decisions going through the brain’s neural pathways, the memory dependence or “memory of the memory” occurs when people follow the same old neural pathway over time. As paying attention to history is an obvious mental visit to the memory neural pathways, those who study the history are doomed to repeat it.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank J. Fabozzi & K. C. Chen & K. C. Ma & Ramesh Rao, 2024. "Those Who Learn from History Are Doomed to Repeat It," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 151-166, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:25:y:2024:i:2:p:151-166
    DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2022.2100387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2022.2100387
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15427560.2022.2100387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:25:y:2024:i:2:p:151-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/hbhf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.