IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cnpexx/v28y2023i6p849-864.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Don’t play if you can’t win’: household disengagement in the Australian pension system

Author

Listed:
  • Antonia Settle

Abstract

Drawing on the literature on political alienation and insider/outsider theory, this paper offers a novel explanation for the failure of some households to embrace the opportunities for financial control offered by the pension system. The analysis uses data from a financial diaries study to construct objective and subjective measures of attitudes, engagement and distributional outcomes for individual households in the Australian pension system. By showing that households that are systematically disadvantaged in the pension system not only are much more likely to be disengaged but have much stronger convictions about unfairness in the system, the findings link disengagement to alienation. The analysis thus proposes that some households reject the system of individualised accounts by disengaging – like ‘outsiders’ reject the political system by abstaining from voting – because they see the system as stacked against them. Drawing on the alienation literature’s analysis of disengagement with political responsibilities of citizenship, the article thus extends the analysis of disengagement to newer financial responsibilities of citizenship.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonia Settle, 2023. "‘Don’t play if you can’t win’: household disengagement in the Australian pension system," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 849-864, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:28:y:2023:i:6:p:849-864
    DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2023.2195159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563467.2023.2195159
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563467.2023.2195159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:28:y:2023:i:6:p:849-864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cnpe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.