IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cnpexx/v26y2021i3p389-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter-Organisational Distrust and the Political Economy of Central Bank Independence in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Jim Buller
  • Ben Whisker

Abstract

This article revisits a puzzle: why did the Conservative Governments of Margaret Thatcher and John Major not grant independence to the Bank of England? A substantial literature offers several explanations for why New Labour carried out this reform to UK monetary policy, many of which ought to have been relevant to the Conservatives’ stewardship of the economy in the 1980s and 1990s. So why did the Conservatives fail to see the advantages of a policy that the Blair Government seized on as one of its first acts of office? Combining new archival research with elite interviews of some key participants during this period, this article re-examines this neglected question. It argues that one overlooked reason why the Conservatives decided against granting independence to the Bank of England relates to the role and importance of inter-organisational distrust. Conservative leaders (and Treasury officials) had negative expectations about the Bank’s ability to implement monetary policy and did not want to increase their dependence on that institution to fulfil a function deemed crucial to their political fortunes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jim Buller & Ben Whisker, 2021. "Inter-Organisational Distrust and the Political Economy of Central Bank Independence in the UK," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 389-405, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:26:y:2021:i:3:p:389-405
    DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2020.1766429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563467.2020.1766429
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563467.2020.1766429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:26:y:2021:i:3:p:389-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cnpe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.