IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v31y2023i1p83-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role models versus modes of rule: the foundation of GfZK, a public-private museum in Leipzig

Author

Listed:
  • Franciska Zólyom

Abstract

The history of founding GfZK – Museum of Contemporary Art in Leipzig reflects both immediate post-1989 euphoria and the conflicting interests and social fears of that time. In the summer of 1989, a group of West German art enthusiasts (patrons, collectors, and entrepreneurs) travelled to Leipzig to meet the East German art historian Klaus Werner. The latter put forth the idea of establishing a new museum in his town, which the West German colleagues accepted and a plan was set in motion. Still, without its own building, the GfZK organized remarkable exhibitions and projects in public spaces throughout the 1990s. At the same time, concerns evoked that the “imported” novel artistic positions would devalue local art production and that, through their money, the private patrons were gaining disproportionate influence to shape public taste and the concept of art. From today’s perspective, both assumptions can be debunked. Through its financing in a public–private partnership, GfZK has embodied a unique museum model in the eastern German states, and the model has proved to be exceptionally productive even beyond the founding years.

Suggested Citation

  • Franciska Zólyom, 2023. "Role models versus modes of rule: the foundation of GfZK, a public-private museum in Leipzig," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 83-94, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:31:y:2023:i:1:p:83-94
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2023.2182506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2023.2182506
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2023.2182506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:31:y:2023:i:1:p:83-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.