IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v29y2021i1p109-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doomed to fail? Why success was almost not an option in the 2020 protests in Belarus

Author

Listed:
  • Sergei A. Mudrov

Abstract

This essay analyses the New Protest Movement in Belarus, strongly manifested after the 9 August 2020 Presidential elections. The Belarusian protests, which initially looked like a serious threat to Lukashenko’s power, have lost eventually their thrust and energy. I argue that the main reasons for the failure of these protests consisted of, first, an underestimation of the real rating of Lukashenko, second, the constrained participation of certain social groups (for instance, industrial and agricultural workers mainly ignored these protests), third, a high degree of consolidation of governmental institutions, and, finally, the loyalty of the police and military to the Belarusian President. In addition, many people were alienated by the protests’ symbols and were scared by harsh oppressive measures, taken by the authorities. Although the 2020 protests did not succeed in removing Lukashenko, or changing his internal or external policies, they revealed an increasing degree of mutual hatred and distrust among different layers of Belarusian society. The atmosphere of fear and threat has become intense as never before, but the people’s desire to change the course of developments has also been on the rise, especially among the younger generation of Belarusians.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergei A. Mudrov, 2021. "Doomed to fail? Why success was almost not an option in the 2020 protests in Belarus," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 109-120, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:29:y:2021:i:1:p:109-120
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2021.1928880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2021.1928880
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2021.1928880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anthony J. Evans, 2024. "Competitive authoritarianism, informational authoritarianism, and the development of dictatorship: a case study of Belarus," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 343-360, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:29:y:2021:i:1:p:109-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.