IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ccasxx/v41y2022i4p654-674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning in, about and from the field? Symbolic functions of EU knowledge production on Central Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Oleg Korneev
  • Karolina Kluczewska

Abstract

Examining the European Union’s (EU) engagement with Central Asia since the early 1990s, we see an increased commitment to context sensitivity. Arguably, in order to design ‘better’ interventions, the EU needs to know more about this region. This article explores three means of EU learning: in the field – through EU officials’ first-hand experience of working at EU Delegations in Central Asia; about the field – through programmed channels of external expert knowledge, and in particular think tanks; and from the field – during institutionalized consultations with multiple local actors, such as academics, journalists and non-governmental organizations. It is argued that despite this complex learning infrastructure, EU knowledge production on Central Asia has a predominantly performative character. Rather than leading to changes in its relations with Central Asia, new knowledge produced by the EU aims at legitimizing this organization’s pre-existing frameworks of engagement and practices of interactions with the region, and substantiating existing policy priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleg Korneev & Karolina Kluczewska, 2022. "Learning in, about and from the field? Symbolic functions of EU knowledge production on Central Asia," Central Asian Survey, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 654-674, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:41:y:2022:i:4:p:654-674
    DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2022.2095352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02634937.2022.2095352
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02634937.2022.2095352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:41:y:2022:i:4:p:654-674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ccas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.