IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i28p3349-3370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The COVID-19 shock and services trade decline: potential for digitalization matters

Author

Listed:
  • Anirudh Shingal

Abstract

Global services trade declined by 20% during 2020 with significant heterogeneity across countries, geographical regions and sectors. We present stylized facts and provide hypotheses and empirical analysis seeking to explain this heterogeneity. The decline is found to be correlated with COVID-19 case and mortality rates; stringency of imposed lockdowns; the decline in merchandise trade; and with different ways of transacting services trade. The latter depends on the sectoral composition of services trade across countries, which in turn emanates from more fundamental determinants of comparative advantage in services, generating testable hypotheses to explain the observed heterogeneity in services trade decline. Focusing on attributes of digitalization and the role of value-chains, we find that human-capital-intensive countries with favourable digital-trade policies and greater ability to leverage ICT infrastructure were associated with relatively smaller declines. Moreover, the expected role of GVC-integration in accentuating the services trade decline finds little support in empirical results across sectors providing evidence instead for the GVC-resilience narrative.

Suggested Citation

  • Anirudh Shingal, 2024. "The COVID-19 shock and services trade decline: potential for digitalization matters," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(28), pages 3349-3370, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:28:p:3349-3370
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2206616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2206616
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2206616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:28:p:3349-3370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.