IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v78y2024i2p209-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Detection of Bias in Peremptory Challenges Using Historical Strike Data

Author

Listed:
  • Sachin S. Pandya
  • Xiaomeng Li
  • Eric Barón
  • Timothy E. Moore

Abstract

United States law bars using peremptory strikes during jury selection because of prospective juror race, ethnicity, sex, or membership in certain other cognizable classes. Here, we extend a Bayesian approach for detecting such illegal strike bias by showing how to incorporate historical data on an attorney’s use of peremptory strikes in past cases. In so doing, we use the power prior to adjust the weight of such historical information in the analysis. Using simulations, we show how the choice of the power prior’s discounting parameter influences bias detection (how likely the credible interval for the bias parameter excludes zero), depending on the degree of incompatibility between current and historical trial data. Finally, we extend this approach with a prototype software application that lawyers could use to detect strike bias in real time during jury-selection. We illustrate this application’s use with real historical strike data from a convenience sample of cases from one court.

Suggested Citation

  • Sachin S. Pandya & Xiaomeng Li & Eric Barón & Timothy E. Moore, 2024. "Bayesian Detection of Bias in Peremptory Challenges Using Historical Strike Data," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(2), pages 209-219, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:2:p:209-219
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2249967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2023.2249967
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2023.2249967?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:78:y:2024:i:2:p:209-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.