IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v52y2022i7p815-837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor protection and audit fees: evidence from the E-interaction platform in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yurou Liu

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of investor protection on audit fees using a quasi-natural experiment provided by the introduction of the E-interaction platform in China. E-interaction provided investors with a platform to communicate directly with listed companies and participate in discussions of corporate matters, thereby enhancing the rights and interests of small and medium-sized investors, i.e. investor protection. Employing a difference-in-differences design, I find that, firms listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange experienced a large reduction in audit fees after the adoption of E-interaction. The results are robust to changes in event windows and alternative research designs. Further analyses demonstrate that the reduction in audit fees was greater for firms with a higher level of expropriation of minority shareholders, i.e. tunnelling. I also find that controlling shareholders’ tunneling behaviours decreased after the introduction of E-interaction. Taken together, my results suggest that increased investor protection reduces audit fees by mitigating agency conflicts between the controlling shareholder and minority shareholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Yurou Liu, 2022. "Investor protection and audit fees: evidence from the E-interaction platform in China," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 815-837, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:52:y:2022:i:7:p:815-837
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2021.1938961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2021.1938961
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2021.1938961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:52:y:2022:i:7:p:815-837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.