IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v51y2021i6-7p707-743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does access to developed audit markets improve home audit quality? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Chee Keung Lam
  • Julia Junxia Liu
  • Rita Wing Yue Yip

Abstract

In December 2010, Hong Kong regulators allowed 12 mainland Chinese registered audit firms to audit companies incorporated in mainland China and listed in Hong Kong (H-shares). In this study, we examine whether access to the Hong Kong audit market improves the quality of audits conducted by these Chinese audit firms for clients listed in the mainland markets (A-shares). Using data from 2008 to 2016, we find that mainland auditors with H-share clients provide higher quality audits, as measured by more modified audit opinions, higher audit fees and less earnings management, than auditors without H-share clients. This effect is more pronounced when the auditors are non-Big 4 firms and the clients are listed only in mainland China. Further analysis shows that A-share investors react positively to the initial announcement that mainland auditors are permitted to conduct H-share audits. Overall, our findings suggest that H-share audits have a positive spillover effect on the quality of A-share audits.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Chee Keung Lam & Julia Junxia Liu & Rita Wing Yue Yip, 2021. "Does access to developed audit markets improve home audit quality? Evidence from China," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6-7), pages 707-743, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:51:y:2021:i:6-7:p:707-743
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2021.1951645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2021.1951645
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2021.1951645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:51:y:2021:i:6-7:p:707-743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.