IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v17y2020i1p78-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Relationship between Audit Tenure and Fees Paid to the Audit Firm and Audit Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Josep Garcia-Blandon
  • Josep Maria Argiles
  • Diego Ravenda

Abstract

We investigate the impact of audit firm tenure, partner tenure, audit fees, fees for non-audit services and total fees on audit quality, as measured by discretionary accruals. Our sample consists of Spanish non-financial public companies for the years between 2006 and 2013. Results indicate that audit quality increases with audit firm tenure but decreases with partner tenure. Moreover, the level of fees paid to the audit firm seems to have a negative impact on audit quality, which is mainly driven by fees for audit services. In this regard, we do not observe any significant relationship between fees for non-audit services and audit quality. Our results also show that the negative relationship between either long partner tenures or high fees and audit quality does not occur when the tenure with the audit firm is long. Therefore, long audit firm tenures do not only seem to involve higher audit quality ‘per se’, but also moderate the negative effects of partner tenure and audit fees on audit quality. The results of this study, which are robust to several sensitivity checks, may be relevant for the current debate on auditor rotation and the joint provision of audit and non-audit services.

Suggested Citation

  • Josep Garcia-Blandon & Josep Maria Argiles & Diego Ravenda, 2020. "On the Relationship between Audit Tenure and Fees Paid to the Audit Firm and Audit Quality," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 78-103, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:78-103
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2019.1669808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2019.1669808
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2019.1669808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:78-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.