IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/src/sbseec/v4y2022i1p167-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeling Black & Blue yet at Work: Physical Job Stressors and Sickness Presenteeism with the Moderation of Organizational Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Sikandar, Pireh
  • Aleemi, Abdur Rahman
  • Irshad, Muhammad
  • Sundus

Abstract

Purpose: Cutthroat competition between the organizations has created tremendous job demands for employees, leading to increased implications for occupational health. This study investigated the impact of physical job stressors, i.e., workplace ergonomics, working conditions, and physical demands, on sickness presenteeism and the moderation of organizational justice (OJ). All the three dimensions of Organizational Justice, namely distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice, were used as a moderator.Design/Methodology/Approach: The current paper follows the positivism approach, and therefore, responses were collected on a structured questionnaire following a quantitative technique. The respondents belonged to the banking industry of Karachi. Using a two-step approach, structural equation modeling on smart PLS was used for analysis.Findings: Findings indicate that physical job stressors, i.e., workplace ergonomics, physical demands, and working conditions, statistically impact sickness presenteeism.Implications/Originality/Value: Furthermore, organizational justice alleviated the impact of physical job stressors on sickness presenteeism. This paper lays down implications for organizations as well as future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sikandar, Pireh & Aleemi, Abdur Rahman & Irshad, Muhammad & Sundus, 2022. "Feeling Black & Blue yet at Work: Physical Job Stressors and Sickness Presenteeism with the Moderation of Organizational Justice," Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies, CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy Pakistan, vol. 4(1), pages 167-178, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:src:sbseec:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:167-178
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v4i1.2207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/sbsee/article/view/2207/1364
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.26710/sbsee.v4i1.2207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:src:sbseec:v:4:y:2022:i:1:p:167-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr Rana Muhammad Adeel Farooq (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrcmpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.