IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v8y2024i3d10.1007_s41669-023-00471-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Evaluation of a Streamlined Day-Case Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Protocol and Conventional Cryoballoon Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in a UK Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Population

Author

Listed:
  • Joe W. E. Moss

    (York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York)

  • Derick Todd

    (Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital)

  • Lukasz Grodzicki

    (York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York)

  • Beatrice Palazzolo

    (York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York)

  • Richard Mattock

    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Stuart Mealing

    (York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York)

  • Maxim Souter

    (Medtronic Limited)

  • Benedict Brown

    (Medtronic International Trading Sarl)

  • Tom Bromilow

    (York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York)

  • Damian Lewis

    (York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York)

  • James McCready

    (Brighton and Sussex University Hospital)

  • Muzahir Tayebjee

    (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust)

  • Ewen Shepherd

    (Newcastle-upon-Tyne NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Thiagarajah Sasikaran

    (Imperial College London)

  • Clare Coyle

    (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London
    Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust)

  • Eleni Ismyrloglou

    (Medtronic Bakken Research Center B.V.)

  • Nicholas A. Johnson

    (Imperial College London)

  • Prapa Kanagaratnam

    (National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London
    Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust)

Abstract

Background and Aims Symptom control for atrial fibrillation can be achieved by catheter ablation or drug therapy. We assessed the cost effectiveness of a novel streamlined atrial fibrillation cryoballoon ablation protocol (AVATAR) compared with optimised antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy and a conventional catheter ablation protocol, from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Methods Data from the AVATAR study were assessed to determine the cost effectiveness of the three protocols in a two-step process. In the first stage, statistical analysis of clinical efficacy outcomes was conducted considering either a three-way comparison (AVATAR vs. conventional ablation vs. optimised AAD therapies) or a two-way comparison (pooled ablation protocol data vs. optimised AAD therapies). In the second stage, models assessed the cost effectiveness of the protocols. Costs and some of the clinical inputs in the models were derived from within-trial cost analysis and published literature. The remaining inputs were derived from clinical experts. Results No significant differences between the ablation protocols were found for any of the clinical outcomes used in the model. Results of a within-trial cost analysis show that AVATAR is cost-saving (£1279 per patient) compared with the conventional ablation protocol. When compared with optimised AAD therapies, AVATAR (pooled conventional and AVATAR ablation protocols efficacy) was found to be more costly while offering improved clinical benefits. Over a lifetime time horizon, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AVATAR was estimated as £21,046 per quality-adjusted life-year gained (95% credible interval £7086–£71,718). Conclusions The AVATAR streamlined protocol is likely to be a cost-effective option versus both conventional ablation and optimised AAD therapy in the UK NHS healthcare setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe W. E. Moss & Derick Todd & Lukasz Grodzicki & Beatrice Palazzolo & Richard Mattock & Stuart Mealing & Maxim Souter & Benedict Brown & Tom Bromilow & Damian Lewis & James McCready & Muzahir Tayebje, 2024. "An Economic Evaluation of a Streamlined Day-Case Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Protocol and Conventional Cryoballoon Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in a UK Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Populati," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 417-429, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00471-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00471-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-023-00471-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-023-00471-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:8:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-023-00471-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.