IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v16y2023i2d10.1007_s40271-022-00605-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fully Vaccinated COVID-19 Patients Over 6 Weeks: The Experiences of Clinical Breakthrough Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Keri Vartanian

    (Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), Providence St. Joseph Health)

  • Daniel Fish

    (Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), Providence St. Joseph Health)

  • Benjamin Gronowski

    (Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), Providence St. Joseph Health)

  • Natalie Kenton

    (Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), Providence St. Joseph Health)

  • Ari Robicsek

    (Providence Research Network)

Abstract

Background While coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have high rates of efficacy, fully vaccinated individuals can become infected with COVID-19. Among this population, symptoms tend to be less severe and shorter lasting. Less is known about how vaccinated individuals who contract COVID-19 experience the disease through patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and how this changes over time. Objective The aim of this study was to describe the physical, mental, and social health PROs for fully vaccinated individuals who contracted COVID-19 over a 6-week period. Design Prospective design using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short-form (PROMIS-10) collected through a mobile application-based platform. Participant 1114 fully vaccinated patients who tested positive for COVID-19 at a large US health system and engaged with the study on or after 1 March 2021 and reported onset of illness prior to 1 November 2021. Main Measures Global physical and mental health PROMIS-10 T-scores for the 6-week period, component PROMIS-10 questions for the 6-week period, and component PROMIS-10 questions restricted to a subset of participants for the first month to measure individual recovery were analyzed. Key Results Mean global physical and mental health T-scores increased over time and remained within one standard deviation of the population mean. At baseline, at least 40% of participants reported good health for all component questions except Fatigue (25%), and the proportion reporting good health increased over time for all questions, with the largest improvements in Fatigue (25.5 to 67.5%), Pain (59.1 to 82.8%), and Emotional Problems (42.3 to 62.5%). Over the first month, the greatest positive changes in individual recovery were observed for Fatigue (65.0%), Pain (53.0%), and Emotional Problems (41.1%); at least 30% of respondents reported no change in at least one category, and the greatest decreases were for Usual Social Activities (23.9%), Social Satisfaction (23.2%), and Mental Health (21.8%). Conclusions This study provides an important step towards better understanding the impact of ‘breakthrough’ COVID-19 infections on clinically engaged, fully vaccinated patients’ physical and mental health to improve support for their treatment and recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Keri Vartanian & Daniel Fish & Benjamin Gronowski & Natalie Kenton & Ari Robicsek, 2023. "Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fully Vaccinated COVID-19 Patients Over 6 Weeks: The Experiences of Clinical Breakthrough Cases," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(2), pages 105-116, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00605-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00605-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-022-00605-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-022-00605-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel S. Bergmans & Keiyana Chambers-Peeple & Deena Aboul-Hassan & Samantha Dell’Imperio & Allie Martin & Riley Wegryn-Jones & Lillian Z. Xiao & Christine Yu & David A. Williams & Daniel J. Clauw & M, 2022. "Opportunities to Improve Long COVID Care: Implications from Semi-structured Interviews with Black Patients," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 15(6), pages 715-728, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00605-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.