IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/manrev/v69y2019i4d10.1007_s11301-019-00158-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic literature review on competitor analysis: status quo and start-up specifics

Author

Listed:
  • Nadja Hatzijordanou

    (Hasso-Plattner-Institute)

  • Nicolai Bohn

    (Hasso-Plattner-Institute)

  • Orestis Terzidis

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine the status quo of research on competitor analysis (CA), which constitutes a cornerstone of strategic management. Of special interest are potential specifications for start-ups which act in an environment of high uncertainty, where CA is supposed to provide meaningful information to determine the right course of action. This study is performed as a conceptually organized systematic literature review with representative coverage and focus on research outcomes. The findings of 78 identified relevant studies out of 43 different journals are analyzed. Results are presented with regard to research contribution, mentioned purposes for conducting CA, CA processes and methods, and elements for ensuring quality of CA. To provide a cohesive understanding of the CA theme, as well as a foundation and guidance for researchers and practitioners, a conceptual framework is derived, which synthesizes the facets of the CA theme in a novel manner. Start-up related research contributions and avenues for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadja Hatzijordanou & Nicolai Bohn & Orestis Terzidis, 2019. "A systematic literature review on competitor analysis: status quo and start-up specifics," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 415-458, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:69:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11301-019-00158-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11301-019-00158-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-019-00158-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11301-019-00158-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. T. Lenz & Jack L. Engledow, 1986. "Environmental analysis: The applicability of current theory," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 329-346, July.
    2. Gelb, Betsy D. & Saxton, Mary Jane & Zinkhan, George M. & Albers, Nancy D., 1991. "Competitive intelligence: Insights from executives," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 43-47.
    3. Brinckmann, Jan & Grichnik, Dietmar & Kapsa, Diana, 2010. "Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning-performance relationship in small firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 24-40, January.
    4. Rajiv Nag & Donald C. Hambrick & Ming‐Jer Chen, 2007. "What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(9), pages 935-955, September.
    5. Guilding, Chris, 1999. "Competitor-focused accounting: an exploratory note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 583-595, October.
    6. Shaker A. Zahra & Donald O. Neubaum & Galal M. El–Hagrassey, 2002. "Competitive Analysis and New Venture Performance: Understanding the Impact of Strategic Uncertainty and Venture Origin," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(1), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Thomas, Philip S., 1974. "Environmental analysis for corporate planning," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 27-38, October.
    8. Sumantra Ghoshal & D. Eleanor Westney, 1991. "Organizing competitor analysis systems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 17-31, January.
    9. Romme, A. Georges L. & Reymen, Isabelle M.M.J., 2018. "Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: Toward an inclusive framework," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Mark Bergen & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2002. "Competitor identification and competitor analysis: a broad-based managerial approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4-5), pages 157-169.
    11. Masoud Yasai-Ardekani & Paul C. Nystrom, 1996. "Designs for Environmental Scanning Systems: Tests of a Contingency Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 187-204, February.
    12. P. Rajan Varadarajan, 1985. "A two‐factor classification of competitive strategy variables," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 357-375, October.
    13. Marc Gruber, 2004. "Marketing In New Ventures: Theory And Empirical Evidence," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 56(2), pages 164-199, April.
    14. Margaret A. Peteraf & Mark E. Bergen, 2003. "Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market‐based and resource‐based framework," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 1027-1041, October.
    15. King, William R & Dutta, Biplab K & Rodriguez, Jaime T, 1978. "Strategic competitive information systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 123-132.
    16. George S. Day, 1981. "Strategic market analysis and definition: An integrated approach," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(3), pages 281-299, July.
    17. Paul Phillips & Kwaku Appiah-Adu, 1998. "Benchmarking to Improve the Strategic Planning Process in the Hotel Sector," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Chandler, Gaylen N. & DeTienne, Dawn R. & McKelvie, Alexander & Mumford, Troy V., 2011. "Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 375-390, May.
    19. Gail L Fann & Larry R. Smeltzer, 1989. "The Use of Information from and about Competitors in Small Business Management," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 13(4), pages 35-46, July.
    20. John E. Prescott & Daniel C. Smith, 1987. "A project‐based approach to competitive analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), pages 411-423, September.
    21. Jesús Rodríguez Pomeda & Patricio Morcillo Ortega & Fernando Casani Fernández De Navarrete & José Miguel Rodríguez Antón, 2001. "Technological Competencies And Competitive Advantage In The Spanish Electricity Industry: New Challenges, New Tools," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(04), pages 457-485.
    22. Arto Ojala & Pasi Tyrväinen, 2006. "Business models and market entry mode choice of small software firms," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 69-81, September.
    23. Christian Fisch & Joern Block, 2018. "Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 103-106, April.
    24. John E. Prescott & John H. Grant, 1988. "A Manager's Guide for Evaluating Competitive Analysis Techniques," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 10-22, June.
    25. Dennis Lyth Frederiksen & Alexander Brem, 2017. "How do entrepreneurs think they create value? A scientific reflection of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 169-189, March.
    26. Robert K. Kazanjian & Robert Drazin, 1989. "An Empirical Test of a Stage of Growth Progression Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1489-1503, December.
    27. Singer, Alan E. & Brodie, Roderick J., 1990. "Forecasting competitors' actions: An evaluation of alternative ways of analyzing business competition," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 75-88.
    28. Joseph G. Walls & George R. Widmeyer & Omar A. El Sawy, 1992. "Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 36-59, March.
    29. Anne G. Evans & Nikhil P. Varaiya, 2003. "Anne Evans: Assessment of a Biotechnology Market Opportunity," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(1), pages 87-106, January.
    30. Volker Frehe & Frank Teuteberg, 2017. "Information and communication technology in green logistics: status quo and research gaps," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 65-96, April.
    31. Bacigalupo Margherita & Kampylis Panagiotis & Punie Yves & Van Den Brande Godelieve, 2016. "EntreComp: The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework for Citizens," JRC Research Reports JRC101581, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    3. Younghoon Lee, 2022. "Identifying Competitive Attributes Based on an Ensemble of Explainable Artificial Intelligence," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(4), pages 407-419, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioanna Deligianni & Irini Voudouris & Spyros Lioukas, 2017. "Do Effectuation Processes Shape the Relationship between Product Diversification and Performance in New Ventures?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(3), pages 349-377, May.
    2. Nicolas Lesca & Marie-Laurence Caron-Fasan, 2005. "La veille vue comme un système cybernétique," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(4), pages 93-120, December.
    3. Shaker A. Zahra & Donald O. Neubaum & Galal M. El–Hagrassey, 2002. "Competitive Analysis and New Venture Performance: Understanding the Impact of Strategic Uncertainty and Venture Origin," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(1), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Anastasiia Laskovaia & Galina Shirokova & Michael H. Morris, 2017. "National culture, effectuation, and new venture performance: global evidence from student entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 687-709, October.
    5. Steffen Runge & Christian Schwens & Matthias Schulz, 2022. "The invention performance implications of coopetition: How technological, geographical, and product market overlaps shape learning and competitive tension in R&D alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 266-294, February.
    6. Da Mota de Pina E Cunha, A.M., 1998. "Determinants of Product Innovation in Organizations : Practices and Performance in the Portugese Financial Sector," Other publications TiSEM e6e4e56e-b72a-4392-8d79-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Jessica Alzamora-Ruiz & María Fuentes-Fuentes & Myriam Martinez-Fiestas, 2021. "Together or separately? Direct and synergistic effects of Effectuation and Causation on innovation in technology-based SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1917-1943, December.
    8. Stroe, Silvia & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2018. "Effectuation or causation: An fsQCA analysis of entrepreneurial passion, risk perception, and self-efficacy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 265-272.
    9. Sylvia Hubner & Fabian Most & Jochen Wirtz & Christine Auer, 2022. "Narratives in entrepreneurial ecosystems: drivers of effectuation versus causation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 211-242, June.
    10. Christoph Keding, 2021. "Understanding the interplay of artificial intelligence and strategic management: four decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 91-134, February.
    11. Rosca, Eugenia & Agarwal, Nivedita & Brem, Alexander, 2020. "Women entrepreneurs as agents of change: A comparative analysis of social entrepreneurship processes in emerging markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Ute Stephan & Przemysław Zbierowski & Ana Pérez-Luño & Dominika Wach & Johan Wiklund & Marisleidy Alba Cabañas & Edgard Barki & Alexandre Benzari & Claudia Bernhard-Oettel & Janet A. Boekhorst & A, 2023. "Act or Wait-and-See? Adversity, Agility, and Entrepreneur Wellbeing across Countries during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(3), pages 682-723, May.
    13. Draksler Tanja Zdolšek & Širec Karin, 2018. "Conceptual Research Model for Studying Students’ Entrepreneurial Competencies," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 64(4), pages 23-33, December.
    14. Marko Matalamäki & Tero Vuorinen & Elina Varamäki & Kirsti Sorama, 2017. "Business Growth in Established Companies; Roles of Effectuation and Causation," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(02), pages 123-148, June.
    15. Jenny María Ruiz-Jiménez & Matilde Ruiz-Arroyo & María Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, 2021. "The impact of effectuation, causation, and resources on new venture performance: novice versus expert entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1761-1781, December.
    16. Ali Marjovi & Behrouz Zarei, 2023. "Design-oriented policy interventions: The case of technology-based international entrepreneurship in emerging context," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 111-142, March.
    17. Johannes Brunzel, 2021. "Overconfidence and narcissism among the upper echelons: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 585-623, July.
    18. Vasconcelos Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de & Salerno, Mario Sergio & Phaal, Robert & Probert, David R., 2018. "How entrepreneurs manage collective uncertainties in innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 164-185.
    19. Igor Laine & Tamara Galkina, 0. "The interplay of effectuation and causation in decision making: Russian SMEs under institutional uncertainty," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-37.
    20. Naemi Schäfer, 2023. "Making transparency transparent: a systematic literature review to define and frame supply chain transparency in the context of sustainability," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 579-604, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:69:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11301-019-00158-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.