IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v24y2021i6d10.1007_s10951-021-00707-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimally rescheduling jobs with a Last-In-First-Out buffer

Author

Listed:
  • Gaia Nicosia

    (Università Roma Tre)

  • Andrea Pacifici

    (Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”)

  • Ulrich Pferschy

    (University of Graz)

  • Julia Resch

    (University of Graz)

  • Giovanni Righini

    (Università degli Studi di Milano)

Abstract

This paper considers single-machine scheduling problems in which a given solution, i.e., an ordered set of jobs, has to be improved as much as possible by re-sequencing the jobs. The need for rescheduling may arise in different contexts, e.g., due to changes in the job data or because of the local objective in a stage of a supply chain that is not aligned with the given sequence. A common production setting entails the movement of jobs (or parts) on a conveyor. This is reflected in our model by facilitating the re-sequencing of jobs via a buffer of limited capacity accessible by a LIFO policy. We consider the classical objective functions of total weighted completion time, maximum lateness and (weighted) number of late jobs and study their complexity. For three of these problems, we present strictly polynomial-time dynamic programming algorithms, while for the case of minimizing the weighted number of late jobs NP-hardness is proven and a pseudo-polynomial algorithm is given.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaia Nicosia & Andrea Pacifici & Ulrich Pferschy & Julia Resch & Giovanni Righini, 2021. "Optimally rescheduling jobs with a Last-In-First-Out buffer," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 663-680, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:24:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s10951-021-00707-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-021-00707-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-021-00707-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-021-00707-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Agnetis & P. Detti & C. Meloni & D. Pacciarelli, 2001. "Set-Up Coordination between Two Stages of a Supply Chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 15-32, October.
    2. Agnetis, Alessandro & Chen, Bo & Nicosia, Gaia & Pacifici, Andrea, 2019. "Price of fairness in two-agent single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 79-87.
    3. Xin Li & José A. Ventura & Kevin A. Bunn, 2021. "A joint order acceptance and scheduling problem with earliness and tardiness penalties considering overtime," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 49-68, February.
    4. Marjan Akker & Han Hoogeveen & Judith Stoef, 2018. "Combining two-stage stochastic programming and recoverable robustness to minimize the number of late jobs in the case of uncertain processing times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 607-617, December.
    5. Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu & Chris N. Potts, 2007. "Rescheduling for Multiple New Orders," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 633-645, November.
    6. Francisco Ballestín & Ángeles Pérez & Sacramento Quintanilla, 2019. "Scheduling and rescheduling elective patients in operating rooms to minimise the percentage of tardy patients," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 107-118, February.
    7. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2014. "A common framework and taxonomy for multicriteria scheduling problems with interfering and competing jobs: Multi-agent scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 1-16.
    8. C. N. Potts & L. N. Van Wassenhove, 1988. "Algorithms for Scheduling a Single Machine to Minimize the Weighted Number of Late Jobs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(7), pages 843-858, July.
    9. Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Michael Pinedo & Guohua Wan, 2010. "Competitive Two-Agent Scheduling and Its Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 458-469, April.
    10. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2010. "Rescheduling for Job Unavailability," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 746-755, June.
    11. Blazewicz, Jacek & Pesch, Erwin & Sterna, Malgorzata & Werner, Frank, 2005. "The two-machine flow-shop problem with weighted late work criterion and common due date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 408-415, September.
    12. Richard L. Daniels & Panagiotis Kouvelis, 1995. "Robust Scheduling to Hedge Against Processing Time Uncertainty in Single-Stage Production," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 363-376, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulrich Pferschy & Julia Resch & Giovanni Righini, 2023. "Algorithms for rescheduling jobs with a LIFO buffer to minimize the weighted number of late jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 267-287, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulrich Pferschy & Julia Resch & Giovanni Righini, 2023. "Algorithms for rescheduling jobs with a LIFO buffer to minimize the weighted number of late jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 267-287, June.
    2. Ruyan He & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Two-Agent Preemptive Pareto-Scheduling to Minimize Late Work and Other Criteria," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Chen, Rubing & Geng, Zhichao & Lu, Lingfa & Yuan, Jinjiang & Zhang, Yuan, 2022. "Pareto-scheduling of two competing agents with their own equal processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 414-431.
    4. Shi-Sheng Li & Jin-Jiang Yuan, 2020. "Single-machine scheduling with multi-agents to minimize total weighted late work," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 497-512, August.
    5. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen, 2023. "Competitive two-agent scheduling with release dates and preemption on a single machine," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 227-249, June.
    6. Zhang, Xingong, 2021. "Two competitive agents to minimize the weighted total late work and the total completion time," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
    7. Gudmundsson, Jens & Hougaard, Jens Leth & Platz, Trine Tornøe, 2023. "Decentralized task coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 851-864.
    8. Geng, Zhichao & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2023. "Single-machine scheduling of multiple projects with controllable processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1074-1090.
    9. Ren-Xia Chen & Shi-Sheng Li, 2019. "Two-agent single-machine scheduling with cumulative deterioration," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 201-219, June.
    10. Omri Dover & Dvir Shabtay, 2016. "Single machine scheduling with two competing agents, arbitrary release dates and unit processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 145-178, March.
    11. Wenchang Luo & Rylan Chin & Alexander Cai & Guohui Lin & Bing Su & An Zhang, 2022. "A tardiness-augmented approximation scheme for rejection-allowed multiprocessor rescheduling," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 690-722, August.
    12. Tang, Lixin & Zhao, Xiaoli & Liu, Jiyin & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2017. "Competitive two-agent scheduling with deteriorating jobs on a single parallel-batching machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 401-411.
    13. Pei, Zhi & Lu, Haimin & Jin, Qingwei & Zhang, Lianmin, 2022. "Target-based distributionally robust optimization for single machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 420-431.
    14. Gao, Yuan & Yuan, Jinjiang & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2019. "A further study on two-agent parallel-batch scheduling with release dates and deteriorating jobs to minimize the makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 74-81.
    15. Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Du-Juan, 2016. "Rescheduling on identical parallel machines with machine disruptions to minimize total completion time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 737-749.
    16. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    17. Liu, Zhixin & Lu, Liang & Qi, Xiangtong, 2018. "Cost allocation in rescheduling with machine unavailable period," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 16-28.
    18. Wang, Dujuan & Yin, Yunqiang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Parallel-machine rescheduling with job unavailability and rejection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 246-260.
    19. Zhang Xingong & Wang Yong, 2017. "Two-agent scheduling problems on a single-machine to minimize the total weighted late work," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 945-955, April.
    20. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng, 2016. "Scheduling two job families on a single machine with two competitive agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 784-799, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:24:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s10951-021-00707-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.