IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i7d10.1007_s10845-016-1280-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of combined Kano model and interactive genetic algorithm for product customization

Author

Listed:
  • Runliang Dou

    (Tianjin University)

  • Yubo Zhang

    (Tianjin University)

  • Guofang Nan

    (Tianjin University)

Abstract

Interactive genetic algorithms (IGAs) have been applied in industrial design to quickly respond to customers’ personalized demand and to achieve customization. However, unreasonable recognition and improper configuration of customization attributes may increase the design complexity, impair efficiency and lead to user fatigue. In this paper, a combined Kano model and IGA approach is proposed for more effective product customization to conduct customer-driven product design by fully considering their individual preferences and simultaneously enhancing effective user involvement. The approach uses the Kano model to recognize different customization attributes and rank them in order of their influence on customer satisfaction. The model then dynamically adjusts these attributes for customization in the IGA-based product design process to more quickly find a satisfying design scheme without leading to user fatigue. A computer-aided design system prototype is developed in the context of the customized design of tablet PCs to prove the maneuverability and effectiveness of the proposed approach. The experimental results demonstrate that the approach could improve customization efficiency to a large extent and fully relieve user fatigue by expediting the process of finding satisfying design individuals for customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Runliang Dou & Yubo Zhang & Guofang Nan, 2019. "Application of combined Kano model and interactive genetic algorithm for product customization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(7), pages 2587-2602, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-016-1280-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-016-1280-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-016-1280-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-016-1280-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darren W. Dahl & Christoph Fuchs & Martin Schreier, 2015. "Why and When Consumers Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A Social Identification Account," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1978-1988, August.
    2. Bernhardt, Dan & Liu, Qihong & Serfes, Konstantinos, 2007. "Product customization," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 1396-1422, August.
    3. Chen, Chun-Chih & Chuang, Ming-Chuen, 2008. "Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 667-681, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Liu & Qiqi Zhi & Haipeng Ji & Bolong Li & Siyuan Lei, 2021. "Wheel hub customization with an interactive artificial immune algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1305-1322, June.
    2. Chunting Liu & Guozhu Jia & Jili Kong, 2020. "Requirement-Oriented Engineering Characteristic Identification for a Sustainable Product–Service System: A Multi-Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fujita, Momoko & Harrigan, Paul & Soutar, Geoffrey N. & Kumar Roy, Sanjit & Roy, Rajat, 2020. "Enhancing member-institution relationships through social media: The role of other-user engagement behavior and similarity perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 642-654.
    2. Fiedler, Jakob & Schorn, André & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2023. "The influence of risk classification and community affiliation on the acceptance of user-innovated medical devices," Working Papers 115, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    3. Vossen, Alexander & Ihl, Christoph, 2020. "More than words! How narrative anchoring and enrichment help to balance differentiation and conformity of entrepreneurial products," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(6).
    4. Yao Wu & Satish Nambisan & Jinghua Xiao & Kang Xie, 2022. "Consumer resource integration and service innovation in social commerce: the role of social media influencers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 429-459, May.
    5. Lars Hornuf & Sabrina Jeworrek, 2018. "How Community Managers Affect Online Idea Crowdsourcing Activities," CESifo Working Paper Series 7153, CESifo.
    6. Ding, Huiping & Chen, Xiangbo & Lin, Kuanhai & Wei, Yunbing, 2019. "Collaborative mechanism of project profit allotment in petroleum engineering service chain with customized integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 163-174.
    7. Oksana Loginova, 2009. "Brand Familiarity and Product Knowledge in Customization," Working Papers 0905, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    8. Damjan Vavpotič & Marko Robnik-Šikonja & Tomaž Hovelja, 2020. "Exploring the Relations Between Net Benefits of IT Projects and CIOs’ Perception of Quality of Software Development Disciplines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 347-360, August.
    9. Oksana Loginova & X. Henry Wang, 2008. "Mass Customization with Vertically Differentiated Products," Working Papers 08-33, NET Institute.
    10. Lihra, Torsten & Buehlmann, Urs & Graf, Raoul, 2012. "Customer preferences for customized household furniture," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 94-112.
    11. A. M. M. Sharif Ullah & Jun'ichi Tamaki, 2011. "Analysis of Kano‐model‐based customer needs for product development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 154-172, June.
    12. Hornuf, Lars & Jeworrek, Sabrina, 2018. "Crowdsourced innovation: How community managers affect crowd activities," IWH Discussion Papers 13/2018, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    13. Hajer Bachouche & Ouidade Sabri-Zaaraoui, 2017. "Are all customer empowerment strategies equally beneficial? The role of brand familiarity and type of empowerment strategies," Post-Print hal-01619956, HAL.
    14. Oksana Loginova, 2010. "Competitive Effects of Mass Customization," Working Papers 1007, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    15. Fang Wang & Hua Li & Aijun Liu, 2018. "A novel method for determining the key customer requirements and innovation goals in customer collaborative product innovation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 211-225, January.
    16. Ebadi Jokandan , Mohsen & Shahbahrami , Asadollah, 2013. "A Solution for the Allocation of Customers Authentication Methods (The Case of Multimedia Contact Center in Agriculture Bank of Iran)," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 8(2), pages 103-124, April.
    17. Zhuojie Xie & Yuhui Wang & Qingxian Wu, 2018. "Battle damage assessment of surface warship formation based on improved gray relational analysis," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 15(3), pages 269-278, July.
    18. Oksana Loginova, 2010. "Brand familiarity and product knowledge in customization," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 6(3), pages 297-309, September.
    19. Loginova, Oksana & Wang, X. Henry, 2013. "Mass customization in an endogenous-timing game with vertical differentiation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 164-173.
    20. Chan Wang & Pu‐yan Nie, 2020. "Retail competition using free shopping shuttle bus strategies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1010-1019, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-016-1280-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.