IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jecstr/v9y2020i1d10.1186_s40008-020-00227-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An agribusiness perspective of demonetization in central region of the state of Gujarat in India

Author

Listed:
  • Ritambhara Singh

    (Anand Agricultural University)

  • Mahesh R. Prajapati

    (Anand Agricultural University)

Abstract

This paper aims at understanding the effect of demonetization announced in November 2016 on agribusiness subsystems, its effect on consumer purchasing criteria, and the problems that surfaced in rural areas to move towards digitalization. This research was exploratory in nature and so adopted an open-ended approach through interviews of 200 farmers selected from 20 villages of two districts; one economically progressive and the other economically backward, in central region of the state of Gujarat in India. Besides, 50 landless farm laborers, 12 input dealers, 20 wholesalers, 20 retailers, 4 each of processors, exporters, and logistic service providers operating in study area were also interviewed. The focus group discussions were also conducted. Secondary data were gathered from various government sources. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the consumer purchasing criteria. Garrett’s ranking technique was used to find the problems of moving to digital transaction. The production activity slowed down due to immediate cash crunch. Agriculture also suffered a setback. Socio-economic factors contributed strongly to the consumer purchasing criteria post-demonetization. The rural economy worked on local credit basis during the demonetization period. Delayed sowing was observed due to non-availability of inputs during initial days of announcement of demonetization. Farm labor suffered losses. Prices of perishables crashed. More bank accounts opened in rural area as dairy payments were made mandatory through electronic mode only. Infrastructural bottlenecks, complex e-banking language and lack of technical knowhow, etc., posed problems before the rural economy to go digital. Strong policy interventions were suggested to make digitalization more popular in rural areas. Removal of infrastructural bottlenecks was suggested to absorb the shock effects of announcements like demonetization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ritambhara Singh & Mahesh R. Prajapati, 2020. "An agribusiness perspective of demonetization in central region of the state of Gujarat in India," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:9:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-020-00227-z
    DOI: 10.1186/s40008-020-00227-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40008-020-00227-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40008-020-00227-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nidhi Aggarwal & Sudha Narayanan, 2017. "Impact of India's Demonetization on Domestic Agricultural Markets," Working Papers id:12294, eSocialSciences.
    2. Ministry of Finance, Government of India,, 2017. "Economic Survey 2016-17," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199477661.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Areendam Chanda & C. Justin Cook, 2019. "Who Gained from India's Demonetization? Insights from Satellites and Surveys," Departmental Working Papers 2019-06, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    2. Muhammad Sajid & Farhan Ahmed & Shafique Ahmed & Aadil Panhwar, 2018. "Viability of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) in Pakistan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 146-154.
    3. G. Somasekhar & K. Srinivasa Krishna & Ashok Kumar Reddy & T. Kishore Kumar & G. Somasekhar, 2021. "Shopper Segmentation Using Multivariate Risk Analysis for Innovative Marketing Strategies," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 60-74, January.
    4. Saddam Hussain & Chunjiao Yu & Ali Sohail & Sadaf Manzoor & Ao Li, 2020. "Assessing the Potential Economic Gains of China-Pakistan-Economic-Corridor Energy Projects for Pakistan," Post-Print hal-03184790, HAL.
    5. Mehtabul Azam, 2017. "Are Urban-Rural Welfare Differences Growing in India?," Economics Working Paper Series 1715, Oklahoma State University, Department of Economics and Legal Studies in Business.
    6. Gabriel Chodorow-Reich & Gita Gopinath & Prachi Mishra & Abhinav Narayanan, 2020. "Cash and the Economy: Evidence from India’s Demonetization," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 57-103.
    7. Karmakar, Sudipto & Narayanan, Abhinav, 2020. "Do households care about cash? Exploring the heterogeneous effects of India's demonetization," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    8. Fiona Burlig & Anant Sudarshan & Garrison Schlauch, 2021. "The Impact of Domestic Travel Bans on COVID-19 is Nonlinear in Their Duration," NBER Working Papers 28699, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Edoardo Chiarotti & Nathalie Monnet, 2019. "Hit them in the Wallet! An Analysis of the Indian Demonetization as a Counter-Insurgency Policy," IHEID Working Papers 03-2019, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    10. Galdo, Virgilio & Li, Yue & Rama, Martin, 2021. "Identifying urban areas by combining human judgment and machine learning: An application to India," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Ravallion, Martin, 2019. "Guaranteed employment or guaranteed income?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 209-221.
    12. Marshall Burke & Vincent Tanutama, 2019. "Climatic Constraints on Aggregate Economic Output," NBER Working Papers 25779, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Fouillet, Cyril & Guérin, Isabelle & Servet, Jean-Michel, 2021. "Demonetization and digitalization: The Indian government's hidden agenda," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    14. Ahmad, Waseem & Ahmed, Tanvir & Ahmad, Bashir, 2019. "Pricing of mobile phone attributes at the retail level in a developing country: Hedonic analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 299-309.
    15. Anindya Bhattacharya & Anirban Kar & Sunil Kumar & Alita Nandi, 2018. "Patronage and power in rural India: a study based on interaction networks," Discussion Papers 18/19, Department of Economics, University of York.
    16. Fritsch, Michael & Sorgner, Alina & Wyrwich, Michael, 2019. "Self-employment and well-being across institutional contexts," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(6).
    17. Rajeswari Sengupta & Harsh Vardhan, 2023. "India’s Credit Landscape in a Post-pandemic World," India Studies in Business and Economics, in: Indrani Gupta & Mausumi Das (ed.), Contextualizing the COVID Pandemic in India, chapter 0, pages 273-295, Springer.
    18. Sudha Narayanan & Nirupam Mehrotra, 2019. "Loan Waivers and Bank Credit: Reflections on the Evidence and the Way Forward," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 44(4), pages 198-210, December.
    19. Jahira Debbarma & Hyoungsuk Lee & Yongrok Choi, 2021. "Sustainable Feasibility of the Environmental-Friendly Policies on Agriculture and Its Related Sectors in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    20. van Horen, Neeltje & Kotidis, Antonios, 2018. "Repo market functioning: The role of capital regulation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13090, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:9:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-020-00227-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.