IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jecfin/v45y2021i1d10.1007_s12197-020-09530-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Keeping what you like: grandfathering and health insurance coverage take-up rates under the ACA

Author

Listed:
  • Nour Kattih

    (Middle Tennessee State University)

  • Fady Mansour

    (Columbus State University)

  • Franklin G. Mixon

    (Columbus State University)

Abstract

According to various reports, between 1.8 million and 4.7 million health insurance plans were replaced shortly after passage of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 with new ACA-compliant plans. In order to limit this occurrence, provisions in the ACA included “grandfathering,” which allowed many Americans to retain health insurance coverage that was in place on or before the ACA was signed into law. These health insurance plans were in many cases favored by individuals and employees because they had been customized, unlike many of the new non-grandfathered plans. This study explores the effect of grandfathering on health insurance coverage take-up rates by employees, given that there are some key differences between grandfathered and non-grandfathered plans that perhaps make the former relatively more attractive to employees. Using survey data from the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research Educational Trust, difference-in-difference regressions reported here suggest that take-up rates for grandfathered health insurance plans are generally higher than those for non-grandfathered plans. Estimates generally place these take-up rate differences, favoring grandfathered plans, somewhere between 2.9 and 8.2 percentage points, depending on plan type, firm size and firm location. This finding suggests that more flexible plans are needed to increase employer-sponsored health insurance coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Nour Kattih & Fady Mansour & Franklin G. Mixon, 2021. "Keeping what you like: grandfathering and health insurance coverage take-up rates under the ACA," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 45(1), pages 188-199, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jecfin:v:45:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s12197-020-09530-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s12197-020-09530-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12197-020-09530-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12197-020-09530-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nour Kattih & Fady Mansour & Franklin G. Mixon, 2019. "Small firms, bigger changes: health insurance coverage take-up rates in small firms after the ACA," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(54), pages 5878-5889, November.
    2. Mary K. Hamman & Kandice A. Kapinos, 2016. "Colorectal Cancer Screening and State Health Insurance Mandates," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 178-191, February.
    3. Haeder, Simon F., 2014. "Balancing adequacy and affordability?: Essential Health Benefits under the Affordable Care Act," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 285-291.
    4. Martin Andersen, 2017. "Constraints on Formulary Design Under the Affordable Care Act," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(12), pages 160-178, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marianne P. Bitler & Christopher S. Carpenter & Danea Horn, 2021. "Effects of the Colorectal Cancer Control Program," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(11), pages 2667-2685, November.
    2. Felix C.H. Gottschalk, 2019. "Why prevent when it does not pay? Prevention when health services are credence goods," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 693-709, May.
    3. Fabrice Smieliauskas & Hari Sharma & Connor Hurley & Jonas A. de Souza & Ya‐Chen Tina Shih, 2018. "State insurance mandates and off‐label use of chemotherapy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 55-70, January.
    4. Michael Geruso & Timothy Layton & Daniel Prinz, 2019. "Screening in Contract Design: Evidence from the ACA Health Insurance Exchanges," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 64-107, May.
    5. Dillender, Marcus, 2018. "What happens when the insurer can say no? Assessing prior authorization as a tool to prevent high-risk prescriptions and to lower costs," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 170-200.
    6. Cici McNamara & Natalia Serna, 2022. "The impact of a national formulary expansion on diabetics," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(11), pages 2311-2332, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jecfin:v:45:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s12197-020-09530-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.