IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/inrvec/v66y2019i3d10.1007_s12232-018-0307-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Martin Luther and the making of the modern economic mind

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Robinson Rössner

    (University of Manchester)

Abstract

Martin Luther has, in the modern economic as well as historian’s literature, often been portrayed as a mediaeval ignoramus helplessly shouting against the forces of modern capitalism, with little meaningful economic insight or contribution made to modern economic reasoning. In my paper, I would like to challenge this view. A first section provides a brief sketch of the evolution of economic knowledge in Europe during the centuries of capitalism’s ascendancy, 1250s–1850s. I would like to suggest that what today is claimed as having been the past “mainstream” does not necessarily correspond to what the mainstream way of thinking about the market process really was in the past or the centuries of European capitalism in its ascendancy, 1250s–1850s. A second section then discusses the intellectual origins of Martin Luther’s theology and market theory in the light of the remarks made in section one. It argues that to fully understand Luther’s economics also means we have to engage with the origins of his theology, not only because his economics and theology were intrinsically related and built upon one another, but because in a historical context it makes little sense to analytically disentangle theology from economics. A third section provides a sketch of Martin Luther’s economics, also demonstrating how Luther fits into the genealogy of modern economic knowledge. The fourth section concludes.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Robinson Rössner, 2019. "Martin Luther and the making of the modern economic mind," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(3), pages 233-248, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:inrvec:v:66:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12232-018-0307-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12232-018-0307-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12232-018-0307-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12232-018-0307-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John D. Singleton, 2011. ""Money Is a Sterile Thing": Martin Luther on the Immorality of Usury Reconsidered," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 683-698, Winter.
    2. Raymond de Roover, 1955. "Scholastic Economics: Survival and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(2), pages 161-190.
    3. Erik S. Reinert & Kenneth Carpenter & Fernanda A. Reinert & Sophus A. Reinert, 2017. "80 Economic Bestsellers before 1850: A Fresh Look at the History of Economic Thought," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 74, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    4. North,Douglass C. & Wallis,John Joseph & Weingast,Barry R., 2013. "Violence and Social Orders," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107646995.
    5. Odd Langholm, 2009. "Martin Luther's Doctrine on Trade and Price in Its Literary Context," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 89-107, Spring.
    6. Bruce Elmslie, 2015. "Early English Mercantilists and the Support of Liberal Institutions," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 419-448, September.
    7. Erik S. Reinert (ed.), 2004. "Globalization, Economic Development and Inequality," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1570.
    8. Morgan,Mary S., 2012. "The World in the Model," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107002975.
    9. Morgan,Mary S., 2012. "The World in the Model," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521176194.
    10. Langholm,Odd, 1998. "The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521621595.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur Brackmann Netto, 2017. "The Double Edge of Case-Studies: A Frame-Based Definition of Economic Models," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_21, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    2. Peter Rodenburg, 2016. "How Full is Full Employment?How Tools and Not Theory Explained Full Employment," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 5-25.
    3. Morgan, Mary S., 2020. "Inducing visibility and visual deduction," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103540, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Dorin, Bruno & Joly, Pierre-Benoît, 2020. "Modelling world agriculture as a learning machine? From mainstream models to Agribiom 1.0," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Sachie Mizohata & Raynald Jadoul, 2013. "Towards International and Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration for the Measurements of Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 683-708, May.
    6. Gene Callahan & Andreas Hoffmann, 2017. "Two-Population Social Cycle Theories," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on New Directions in Sraffa Scholarship, volume 35, pages 303-321, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    7. Michael McLure & Aldo Montesano, 2020. "Extending Edgeworth: Labour Exchange and Production," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 20-08, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    8. Ramzi Mabsout, 2018. "The Backward Induction Controversy as a Metaphorical Problem," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 7(1), pages 24-49, March.
    9. Khamdamov, T., 2022. "A brief overview of the evolution of computer simulations in economic research," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 189-207.
    10. Łukasz Hard, 2014. "Models of Mechanisms and their Role in Building Economic Explanations," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    11. Judy L Klein, 2015. "The Cold War Hot House for Modeling Strategies at the Carnegie Institute of Technology," Working Papers Series 19, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    12. Nicolas Brisset, 2018. "Models as speech acts: the telling case of financial models," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 21-41, January.
    13. Ivan Verbanov, 2003. "Forerunner of the Theories of the Free Market Economy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 72-88.
    14. Ryan Rumble & Vincent Mangematin, 2015. "Business Model Implementation: The Antecedents of Multi-Sidedness," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01183388, HAL.
    15. Nicola Giocoli, 2016. "Truth or precision? Some reflections on the economists’ failure to predict the financial crisis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(4), pages 371-386, December.
    16. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2015. "Business Models and Modelling Business Models," Post-Print hal-01183386, HAL.
    17. Asad Zaman & Taseer Salahuddin, 2020. "Models and Reality: How Did Models Divorced from Reality Become Epistemologically Acceptable?," International Econometric Review (IER), Econometric Research Association, vol. 12(1), pages 50-74, April.
    18. Mohammad Hajigholizadeh & Assefa M. Melesse & Hector R. Fuentes, 2018. "Erosion and Sediment Transport Modelling in Shallow Waters: A Review on Approaches, Models and Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    19. John Rust, 2014. "The Limits of Inference with Theory: A Review of Wolpin (2013)," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(3), pages 820-850, September.
    20. Mielke, Jahel & Steudle, Gesine A., 2018. "Green Investment and Coordination Failure: An Investors' Perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 88-95.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Martin Luther; History of economic thought; History of political economy; Reformation economics; Renaissance economics; Scholastic economics; Pre-classical;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B10 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - General
    • B11 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic)
    • B11 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic)
    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General
    • N01 - Economic History - - General - - - Development of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:inrvec:v:66:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12232-018-0307-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.