IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v12y2022i1d10.1186_s13561-022-00367-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative and conventional “conservative” technologies for the treatment of uterine fibroids in Italy: a multidimensional assessment

Author

Listed:
  • L. Ferrario

    (LIUC- Università Cattaneo)

  • E. Garagiola

    (LIUC- Università Cattaneo)

  • C. Gerardi

    (IRCCS- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”)

  • G. Bellavia

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • S. Colombo

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • C. Ticca

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • C. Rossetti

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • M. Ciboldi

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • M. Meroni

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • A. Vanzulli

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • A. Rampoldi

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • T. Bignardi

    (ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda)

  • F. Arrigoni

    (University of L’Aquila)

  • E. Porazzi

    (LIUC- Università Cattaneo)

  • E. Foglia

    (LIUC- Università Cattaneo)

Abstract

Background To evaluate the potential benefits of the Magnetic Resonance-guided high intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) introduction in the clinical practice, for the treatment of uterine fibroids, in comparison with the standard “conservative” procedures, devoted to women who wish to preserve their uterus or enhance fertility: myomectomy and uterine artery embolization (UAE). Methods A Health Technology Assessment was conducted, assuming the payer’s perspective (Italian National Healthcare Service). The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deeply investigated, by means of i) a literature review; ii) the implementation of health economics tools (useful for uterine fibroids patients’ clinical pathway economic evaluation, and budget impact analysis), to define MRgFUS economic and organizational sustainability, and iii) administration of specific questionnaires filled by uterine fibroids’ experts, to gather their perceptions on the three possible conservative approaches (MRgFUS, UAE and myomectomy). Results Literature revealed that MRgFUS would generate several benefits, from a safety and an efficacy profile, with significant improvement in symptoms relief. Advantages emerged concerning the patients’ perspective, thus leading to a decrease both in the length of hospital stay (p-value

Suggested Citation

  • L. Ferrario & E. Garagiola & C. Gerardi & G. Bellavia & S. Colombo & C. Ticca & C. Rossetti & M. Ciboldi & M. Meroni & A. Vanzulli & A. Rampoldi & T. Bignardi & F. Arrigoni & E. Porazzi & E. Foglia, 2022. "Innovative and conventional “conservative” technologies for the treatment of uterine fibroids in Italy: a multidimensional assessment," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:12:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-022-00367-x
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-022-00367-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-022-00367-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-022-00367-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:12:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-022-00367-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.