IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v84y2023i3d10.1007_s10589-022-00440-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conic formulation of QPCCs applied to truly sparse QPs

Author

Listed:
  • Immanuel M. Bomze

    (University of Vienna)

  • Bo Peng

    (University of Vienna)

Abstract

We study (nonconvex) quadratic optimization problems with complementarity constraints, establishing an exact completely positive reformulation under—apparently new—mild conditions involving only the constraints, not the objective. Moreover, we also give the conditions for strong conic duality between the obtained completely positive problem and its dual. Our approach is based on purely continuous models which avoid any branching or use of large constants in implementation. An application to pursuing interpretable sparse solutions of quadratic optimization problems is shown to satisfy our settings, and therefore we link quadratic problems with an exact sparsity term $$\Vert {{\mathsf {x}}}\Vert _0$$ ‖ x ‖ 0 to copositive optimization. The covered problem class includes sparse least-squares regression under linear constraints, for instance. Numerical comparisons between our method and other approximations are reported from the perspective of the objective function value.

Suggested Citation

  • Immanuel M. Bomze & Bo Peng, 2023. "Conic formulation of QPCCs applied to truly sparse QPs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 703-735, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:84:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-022-00440-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-022-00440-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-022-00440-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-022-00440-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pietro Belotti & Pierre Bonami & Matteo Fischetti & Andrea Lodi & Michele Monaci & Amaya Nogales-Gómez & Domenico Salvagnin, 2016. "On handling indicator constraints in mixed integer programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 545-566, December.
    2. Tiago Andrade & Fabricio Oliveira & Silvio Hamacher & Andrew Eberhard, 2019. "Enhancing the normalized multiparametric disaggregation technique for mixed-integer quadratic programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 701-722, April.
    3. Immanuel Bomze & Werner Schachinger & Gabriele Uchida, 2012. "Think co(mpletely)positive ! Matrix properties, examples and a clustered bibliography on copositive optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 423-445, March.
    4. Jiahan Li, 2015. "Sparse and Stable Portfolio Selection With Parameter Uncertainty," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 381-392, July.
    5. Bomze, Immanuel M., 2012. "Copositive optimization – Recent developments and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 509-520.
    6. Jing Zhou & Shu-Cherng Fang & Wenxun Xing, 2017. "Conic approximation to quadratic optimization with linear complementarity constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 97-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bomze, Immanuel M. & Gabl, Markus, 2023. "Optimization under uncertainty and risk: Quadratic and copositive approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 449-476.
    2. Zhijian Lai & Akiko Yoshise, 2022. "Completely positive factorization by a Riemannian smoothing method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 933-966, December.
    3. Alexander Engau & Miguel Anjos & Immanuel Bomze, 2013. "Constraint selection in a build-up interior-point cutting-plane method for solving relaxations of the stable-set problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 78(1), pages 35-59, August.
    4. Carmo Brás & Gabriele Eichfelder & Joaquim Júdice, 2016. "Copositivity tests based on the linear complementarity problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 461-493, March.
    5. Andrey Afonin & Roland Hildebrand & Peter J. C. Dickinson, 2021. "The extreme rays of the $$6\times 6$$ 6 × 6 copositive cone," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 153-190, January.
    6. Peter Dickinson & Luuk Gijben, 2014. "On the computational complexity of membership problems for the completely positive cone and its dual," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 403-415, March.
    7. Abdeljelil Baccari & Mourad Naffouti, 2016. "Copositivity and Sparsity Relations Using Spectral Properties," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 998-1007, December.
    8. Tae-Hwy Lee & Ekaterina Seregina, 2020. "Optimal Portfolio Using Factor Graphical Lasso," Working Papers 202025, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    9. Bollerslev, Tim & Patton, Andrew J. & Quaedvlieg, Rogier, 2018. "Modeling and forecasting (un)reliable realized covariances for more reliable financial decisions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 71-91.
    10. Wong, Man Hong & Zhang, Shuzhong, 2014. "On distributional robust probability functions and their computations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 23-33.
    11. Stefania Corsaro & Valentina Simone, 2019. "Adaptive $$l_1$$ l 1 -regularization for short-selling control in portfolio selection," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 457-478, March.
    12. Qifa Xu & Junqing Zuo & Cuixia Jiang & Yaoyao He, 2021. "A large constrained time‐varying portfolio selection model with DCC‐MIDAS: Evidence from Chinese stock market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 3417-3435, July.
    13. O. I. Kostyukova & T. V. Tchemisova, 2022. "On strong duality in linear copositive programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 457-480, July.
    14. Immanuel Bomze & Werner Schachinger & Gabriele Uchida, 2012. "Think co(mpletely)positive ! Matrix properties, examples and a clustered bibliography on copositive optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 423-445, March.
    15. Dimitri J. Papageorgiou & Francisco Trespalacios, 2018. "Pseudo basic steps: bound improvement guarantees from Lagrangian decomposition in convex disjunctive programming," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 55-83, March.
    16. Cafieri, Sonia & Conn, Andrew R. & Mongeau, Marcel, 2023. "Mixed-integer nonlinear and continuous optimization formulations for aircraft conflict avoidance via heading and speed deviations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 670-679.
    17. Francisco Jara-Moroni & John E. Mitchell & Jong-Shi Pang & Andreas Wächter, 2020. "An enhanced logical benders approach for linear programs with complementarity constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 687-714, August.
    18. Li, Xiaobo & Natarajan, Karthik & Teo, Chung-Piaw & Zheng, Zhichao, 2014. "Distributionally robust mixed integer linear programs: Persistency models with applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 459-473.
    19. Immanuel Bomze & Markus Gabl, 2021. "Interplay of non-convex quadratically constrained problems with adjustable robust optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 93(1), pages 115-151, February.
    20. Jean-Baptiste Hiriart-Urruty & Hai Le, 2013. "A variational approach of the rank function," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 207-240, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:84:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-022-00440-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.