IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v22y2024i3d10.1007_s40258-023-00857-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treatment Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Depressive Symptoms: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth C. Waumans

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit)

  • Anna D. T. Muntingh

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit)

  • Jorien Veldwijk

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Adriaan Hoogendoorn

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit)

  • Anton J. L. M. Balkom

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit)

  • Neeltje M. Batelaan

    (Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit)

Abstract

Background Depression in adolescents and young adults is common and causes considerable disease burden while hampering their development, leading to adverse consequences in later life. Although treatment is available, young people are a vulnerable group regarding uptake and completion of treatment. To improve this, insight into youth’s preferences for treatment is essential. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate patient preferences for depression treatment in a Dutch sample aged 16–24 years using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Methods The study was conducted in The Netherlands between October 2018 and June 2019, and included 236 adolescents and young adults with current depressive symptoms or previous treatment. The DCE included five attributes (treatment type, frequency of appointment, waiting time, effectiveness, evaluation of therapeutic alliance) with corresponding levels. Results were analysed using latent class analysis. Results Results show a general preference for individual psychotherapy, treatment with high frequency, high effectiveness, short waiting time and a standard evaluation of the therapeutic alliance (‘click’ with the therapist) early in treatment. Latent class analysis revealed three different patterns of preferences regarding treatment type and willingness to engage in therapy. The first class showed a strong preference for individual therapy. The second class, including relatively older, higher educated and treatment-experienced participants, preferred high frequency treatment and was more open to different forms of therapy. The third class, including lower educated, younger and treatment-naïve adolescents showed reluctance to engage in therapy overall and in group therapy specifically. Conclusion In this DCE, three classes could be identified that share similar preferences regarding treatment effectiveness, waiting time and evaluation of the therapeutic alliance, but varied considerably in their preference for treatment type (individual, group, or combined psychotherapy) and their willingness to engage. The results from this study may inform mental health care providers and institutions and help optimize professional care for adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms, improving engagement in this vulnerable group.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth C. Waumans & Anna D. T. Muntingh & Jorien Veldwijk & Adriaan Hoogendoorn & Anton J. L. M. Balkom & Neeltje M. Batelaan, 2024. "Treatment Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Depressive Symptoms: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 401-413, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40258-023-00857-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40258-023-00857-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.