IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/journl/v3y2018i2p51-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valued and Devalued Landmarks of Postmodern Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Iacob Coman

    (Dimitrie Cantemir University of Târgu Mureş, Romania)

Abstract

In this study, we try to capture the phenomenon of redefining ethics at a proposal level. Human society in general and European and American society in particular have detached themselves from the ethical classicism that has lasted for millennia. The authority over the historical taboos at this beginning of the millennium is unique in the history of mankind and unique in its actions. Supported by scientific discoveries, contemporary society manages to value the unethical classic and devalue intrinsic ethics in ways that propose a completely different ethics. We intend to debate this reality from a perspective with slight biblical accents and yet equidistant in discourse and conclusions. The three parts of the paper-Devalued Biblical Ethical Landmarks, Valued Humanist Unethical Landmarks and Valorisation and Devaluation of the Ethical Being-are also the paradigms through which we evaluate this redefinition of ethics.

Suggested Citation

  • Iacob Coman, 2018. "Valued and Devalued Landmarks of Postmodern Ethics," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 51-61, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:51-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/59/42
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/download/59/42
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:51-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.