IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sek/jijobm/v7y2019i1p48-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interorganizational relations and organizational capabilities in Internet of Things businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Fumihiko Isada

    (The Faculty of Informatics, Kansai University)

  • Yuriko Isada

    (School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to quantitatively clarify interorganizational relations and organizational capabilities suitable for IoT (Internet of Things) business. Moreover, we also proposed to look for the reasons why Japanese IoT-related businesses are not necessarily successful. According to prior research, it is thought that open innovation is useful in IoT business. This is because system cooperation and various types of technological knowledge are required of IoT business. Then, there are two general possibilities for the form of open innovation: selection with a large network and a narrow network. That there is much opportunity for outside encounters increases the opportunity for innovation. On the other hand, in reducing the number of cooperation partners and investing strategically in business resources, the success rate of a technological development may increase. Moreover, to utilize an open innovation, an organizational capability that fits an open innovation may be required. According to previous research, in interorganizational relations, selective ability and integration capability are important. It is thought that a high level of selective ability is very important. As compared with typical businesses, it is thought that there is much opportunity to select an external technology in which a company is inexperienced. On the other hand, it is also thought that the integration/coordination ability to advance the cooperation process steadily against the uncertain technology challenges among external organizations becomes important. As a methodology, a questionnaire was carried out to IT-related companies that undertake IoT business. As a result, the character of the interorganizational relations and the organizational capabilities related to profitability in IoT businesses became clear. The study also showed the challenge against organization management of the former type of Japanese firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Fumihiko Isada & Yuriko Isada, 2019. "Interorganizational relations and organizational capabilities in Internet of Things businesses," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 48-62, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:jijobm:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:48-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-business-management/publication-detail-17372
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-business-management/publication-detail-17372?download=4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Raisch & Julian Birkinshaw & Gilbert Probst & Michael L. Tushman, 2009. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 685-695, August.
    2. Langlois, Richard N. & Robertson, Paul L., 1992. "Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 297-313, August.
    3. Ulrich, Karl, 1995. "The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 419-440, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Rossi & Alessandro Narduzzo, 2003. "Modular design and the development of complex artifact lesson fron free open source software," Quaderni DISA 080, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 29 Sep 2003.
    2. Vincent Frigant & Damien Talbot, 2003. "Convergence et diversité du passage à la production modulaire dans l'aéronautique et l'automobile en Europe," Post-Print hal-00246171, HAL.
    3. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    4. Vincent Frigant & Damien Talbot, 2007. "Proximites Et Logique Modulaire Dans L'Automobile Et L'Aeronautique : Vers Une Dualisation Des Espaces D'Approvisionnement," Post-Print hal-02376436, HAL.
    5. Damien Talbot, 2018. "L’industrie aéronautique civile européenne : vers une banalisation ?," Post-Print halshs-02007393, HAL.
    6. Rahul Kapoor, 2013. "Persistence of Integration in the Face of Specialization: How Firms Navigated the Winds of Disintegration and Shaped the Architecture of the Semiconductor Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1195-1213, August.
    7. Nicholas Burton & Peter Galvin, 2020. "Component complementarity and transaction costs: the evolution of product design," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 845-867, August.
    8. Frigant, 2004. "Modularity: the foundations of an architect firm? (In French)," Industrial Organization 0405002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Pammolli, Fabio & Tani, Simone, 1996. "The changing boundaries of system companies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(6), pages 539-560, December.
    10. Cabigiosu, Anna & Zirpoli, Francesco & Camuffo, Arnaldo, 2013. "Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 662-675.
    11. Ing-Shane Yung & Chin-Fa Tsai, 2016. "The Effect of the Fit Between Product Architecture and Competitive Action on Business Performance: An Empirical Study of the Taiwan IT Industry," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 1-25, August.
    12. Leonardo Bargigli, 2005. "The limits of modularity in innovation and production," KITeS Working Papers 176, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Sep 2005.
    13. Mario Benassi, 2009. "Investigating modular organizations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 13(3), pages 163-192, August.
    14. Baldwin, Carliss & MacCormack, Alan & Rusnak, John, 2014. "Hidden structure: Using network methods to map system architecture," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1381-1397.
    15. Fujita, Mai, 2013. "Exploring the sources of China's challenge to Japan : models of industrial organisation in the motorcycle industry," IDE Discussion Papers 419, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    16. Vincent FRIGANT, 2007. "Between Internationalisation and Proximity: the internationalisation process of automotive first tier suppliers," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2007-13, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    17. Vincent Frigant, 2005. "Vanishing hand versus Systems integrators - Une revue de la littérature sur l'impact organisationnel de la modularité," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 109(1), pages 29-52.
    18. Arash Najmaei, 2016. "Revisiting The Modularity-Performance Nexus: Business Model Innovation As A Missing Mechanism," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-41, October.
    19. Jesús Lampón & Pablo Cabanelas & Vincent Frigant, 2017. "The new automobile modular platforms: from the product architecture to the manufacturing network approach?," Post-Print hal-03187886, HAL.
    20. Serghei Floricel & Sorin Piperca & Richard Tee, 2018. "Strategies for Managing the Structural and Dynamic Consequences of Project Complexity," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    interorganizational relations; organizational capabilities; IoT-related businesses; large network; deep network; selection capability; integration capability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:jijobm:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:48-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijobm.iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.