IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/wnewec/y2018i4p6-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Евразийский экономический союз: успехи и вызовы интеграции // Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration

Author

Listed:
  • L. Grigor’ev M.

    (HSE)

  • V. Brilliantova V.

    (Analytical centre under the Government of the Russian Federation)

  • V. Pavlyushina A.

    (HSE Banking Institute)

  • Л . Григорьев М.

    (НИУ ВШЭ)

  • В. Бриллиантова В.

    (Аналитический центр при Правительстве Российской Федерации)

  • В. Павлюшина А.

    (Банковский институт НИУ ВШЭ)

Abstract

The question of Eurasian integration is of great interest to politicians and academics for many reasons. First, it is the only existing and developing integration association in the former Soviet Union. Second, this association is valid in the neighbourhood of the European Union. Thirdly, this association is close to the sphere of important trade and investment interests of China. And finally, it is important that the EAEU was formed after 2014 — the beginning of the “sanctions” period in the life of Russia and the world. Integration in the Eurasian space is a unique case when previously closely interconnected countries within the framework of the central planning system, having survived the collapse of the former economic reality and still being in a protracted transformation process, restore their economic ties in a new market environment. In the case of the CIS, reintegration has not developed for some political reasons, despite available economic conditions. In addition to the analysis of macroeconomic and institutional parameters of the countries, the article presents the results of the classification of the regions of four EAEU countries: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. To optimise the cross-country comparison, we simplified the classification by the peculiarities of the administrative division of other EAEU members. Тема Евразийской интеграции вызывает большой интерес у политиков и в академических кругах по многим причинам. Во-первых, это единственное действующее и развивающееся интеграционное объединение на пространстве бывшего СССР. Во-вторых, это объединение действует рядом с Европейским cоюзом. В-третьих, это объединение находится близко к кругу важных торговых и инвестиционных интересов Китая. И наконец, немаловажно, что ЕАЭС образовался уже после 2014 г. — начала «санкционного» периода в жизни России и мира. Интеграция на евразийском пространстве — это уникальный случай, когда ранее тесно взаимосвязанные страны в рамках системы центрального планирования, пережив крах экономической реальности и все еще находясь в затяжном трансформационном процессе, восстанавливают экономические связи в новой рыночной форме. В случае с СНГ по ряду политических причин реинтеграция не сложилась, несмотря на наличие определенных экономических предпосылок для нее. В данной статье, помимо анализа макроэкономических и институциональных параметров стран, приведены результаты классификации регионов четырех стран ЕАЭС: Армении, Беларуси, Казахстана и Кыргызстана. Для оптимизации межстранового сравнения классификация была упрощена в соответствии с особенностями административного деления других участников ЕАЭС.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Grigor’ev M. & V. Brilliantova V. & V. Pavlyushina A. & Л . Григорьев М. & В. Бриллиантова В. & В. Павлюшина А., 2018. "Евразийский экономический союз: успехи и вызовы интеграции // Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration," Мир новой экономики // The world of new economy, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Governtment оf The Russian Federation, vol. 12(4), pages 6-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2018:i:4:p:6-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/204/196.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Grigoriev & S. Kondratiev & M. Salikhov., 2008. "Difficult Way out of Transformational Crisis," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 10.
    2. Mikhail Iosifovich Krotov & Valery Ivanovich Muntiyan, 0. "Eurasian Economic Union: History, Features, Prospects," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 11.
    3. Batsaikhan, Uuriintuya & Dabrowski, Marek, 2017. "Central Asia — twenty-five years after the breakup of the USSR," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 296-320.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan & Sung, Jinsok & Talipova, Amina & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2022. "Analyzing energy trade policy in Central Asia using the intercountry trade force approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 441-454.
    2. Wang, Chao & Lim, Ming K. & Zhang, Xinyi & Zhao, Longfeng & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2020. "Railway and road infrastructure in the Belt and Road Initiative countries: Estimating the impact of transport infrastructure on economic growth," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 288-307.
    3. Kim, Hyerang & Shon, Soonyoung & Shin, Hyunsook, 2020. "Exploring the unmet needs for creating an enabling environment for nurturing care to promote migrant child health in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: A theory-guided community-based participatory action research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Hartwell, Christopher A. & Popova, Olga, 2023. "Energy efficiency, market competition, and quality certification: Lessons from Central Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Mirzobobo Yormirzoev, 2022. "Economic Growth and Productivity Performance in Central Asia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 64(3), pages 520-539, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:wnewec:y:2018:i:4:p:6-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://worldneweconomy.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.