IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v53y2024i2p940-967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visual Design and Cognition in List-Style Open-Ended Questions in Web Probing

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Meitinger
  • Tanja Kunz

Abstract

Previous research reveals that the visual design of open-ended questions should match the response task so that respondents can infer the expected response format. Based on a web survey including specific probes in a list-style open-ended question format, we experimentally tested the effects of varying numbers of answer boxes on several indicators of response quality. Our results showed that using multiple small answer boxes instead of one large box had a positive impact on the number and variety of themes mentioned, as well as on the conciseness of responses to specific probes. We found no effect on the relevance of themes and the risk of item non-response. Based on our findings, we recommend using multiple small answer boxes instead of one large box to convey the expected response format and improve response quality in specific probes. This study makes a valuable contribution to the field of web probing, extends the concept of response quality in list-style open-ended questions, and provides a deeper understanding of how visual design features affect cognitive response processes in web surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Meitinger & Tanja Kunz, 2024. "Visual Design and Cognition in List-Style Open-Ended Questions in Web Probing," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(2), pages 940-967, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:53:y:2024:i:2:p:940-967
    DOI: 10.1177/00491241221077241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00491241221077241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00491241221077241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:53:y:2024:i:2:p:940-967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.