IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v52y2024i2p241-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anticharismatic Authority: Joe Biden's Approximation of the Ideal Type

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Wagner-Pacifici

Abstract

Sociologists have productively theorized power and politics via typologies and genealogies. This article combines these theorizing modalities to analyze the election of Joseph Biden in the 2020 US presidential election. Thinking about presidential genealogy, the semiotics of sequence and succession favored humility over hubris in the victory of Biden after Donald Trump. As well, drawing on Weber's three types of authority (traditional, charismatic, and legal-rational) and Fred Block's elaboration of a flexible but constrained and accountable missing fourth type, this article terms that fourth type anticharisma and reads Joe Biden as an anticharismatic aspirant. Whereas charisma draws its strength from the monopolization of attention by the leader, rupture, and crisis, anticharisma aspires to domestic tranquility, competence, familiarity, and empathy. The elaborated typology of authority presented here provides important angles into both the election of Joe Biden as the anticharismatic candidate and the constraints on democratic leadership in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Wagner-Pacifici, 2024. "Anticharismatic Authority: Joe Biden's Approximation of the Ideal Type," Politics & Society, , vol. 52(2), pages 241-267, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:52:y:2024:i:2:p:241-267
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292231158915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292231158915
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292231158915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:52:y:2024:i:2:p:241-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.