IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v52y2024i2p171-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming the Welfare State, One Case at a Time: How Utrecht Makes Customized Social Care Work

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Sabel

    (Columbia Law School)

  • Jonathan Zeitlin

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Jan-Kees Helderman

    (Radboud University Nijmegen)

Abstract

Advanced welfare states are under pressure to customize services, promptly enough to prevent a cascade of harms. With these goals, the Netherlands in 2015 decentralized social care services to municipalities, and within municipalities to neighborhood teams in continuing contact with clients. The overall results have been disappointing. But the experience of Utrecht, the Netherlands’ fourth-largest city, has been strikingly different. By using hard-to-resolve cases to signal conflicts in rules, obstructive jurisdictional boundaries, and the shortcomings of private service providers, Utrecht is learning to customize and speed delivery of social care through incremental steps. This article explains how Utrecht's success addresses apparently intractable limits to the adaptability of the rule-bound welfare state, such as the problem of low-level discretion or street-level bureaucracy and the division of services into silos, in the process bridging, and perhaps effacing, the gap between the Habermasian life world and the system world of formal rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Sabel & Jonathan Zeitlin & Jan-Kees Helderman, 2024. "Transforming the Welfare State, One Case at a Time: How Utrecht Makes Customized Social Care Work," Politics & Society, , vol. 52(2), pages 171-207, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:52:y:2024:i:2:p:171-207
    DOI: 10.1177/00323292221140710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323292221140710
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00323292221140710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:52:y:2024:i:2:p:171-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.