IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v61y2024i1p150-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Until consensus: Introducing the International Cyber Expression dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Key Canfil

    (Carnegie Mellon University, USA)

Abstract

Extant scholarship has until now relied on informal-theoretic, case study, and interpretative methods to assess patterns of norm development in cyberspace. Ideally, these accounts would be complemented with more systematic cross-national and longitudinal empirical evidence. To address this gap, this article introduces the International Cyber Expression Dataset. The dataset includes a corpus of more than 34,000 official expressions of view by states and their authorized representatives regarding the international politics of cyberspace. The article describes the sources of these data and demonstrates the dataset’s usefulness, with an Online appendix containing an exploratory analysis of norm convergence. Future research can leverage the dataset to empirically test questions of theory and policy. For example, the dataset can be used to study how foundational theories of norm diffusion apply to cyberspace. It can also be paired with existing cyber conflict datasets to study the conditions under which state practice influences cyber discourse, and vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Key Canfil, 2024. "Until consensus: Introducing the International Cyber Expression dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 150-159, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:61:y:2024:i:1:p:150-159
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433231217656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433231217656
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433231217656?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadiya Kostyuk, 2024. "Allies and diffusion of state military cybercapacity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 44-58, January.
    2. William Akoto, 2022. "Accountability and cyber conflict: examining institutional constraints on the use of cyber proxies," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(3), pages 311-332, May.
    3. Christopher J Fariss & Fridolin J Linder & Zachary M Jones & Charles D Crabtree & Megan A Biek & Ana-Sophia M Ross & Taranamol Kaur & Michael Tsai, 2015. "Human Rights Texts: Converting Human Rights Primary Source Documents into Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Christos Makridis & Lennart Maschmeyer & Max Smeets, 2024. "If it bleeps it leads? Media coverage on cyber conflict and misperception," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 72-86, January.
    5. Park, Baekkwan & Greene, Kevin & Colaresi, Michael, 2020. "Human Rights are (Increasingly) Plural: Learning the Changing Taxonomy of Human Rights from Large-scale Text Reveals Information Effects," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(3), pages 888-910, August.
    6. Richard Hanania, 2021. "The Humanitarian Turn at the UNSC: Explaining the development of international norms through machine learning algorithms," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 655-670, July.
    7. Finnemore, Martha & Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 887-917, October.
    8. Miguel Alberto Gomez & Eula Bianca Villar, 2018. "Fear, Uncertainty, and Dread: Cognitive Heuristics and Cyber Threats," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 61-72.
    9. Kathryn Hedgecock & Lauren Sukin, 2023. "Responding to Uncertainty: The Importance of Covertness in Support for Retaliation to Cyber and Kinetic Attacks," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(10), pages 1873-1903, November.
    10. Harry Oppenheimer, 2024. "How the process of discovering cyberattacks biases our understanding of cybersecurity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 28-43, January.
    11. Dennis Broeders & Els de Busser & Fabio Cristiano & Tatiana Tropina, 2022. "Revisiting past cyber operations in light of new cyber norms and interpretations of international law: inching towards lines in the sand?," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 97-135, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan Shandler & Daphna Canetti, 2024. "Introduction: Cyber-conflict – Moving from speculation to investigation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 3-9, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan Shandler & Daphna Canetti, 2024. "Introduction: Cyber-conflict – Moving from speculation to investigation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 3-9, January.
    2. Benjamin Jensen & Brandon Valeriano & Sam Whitt, 2024. "How cyber operations can reduce escalation pressures: Evidence from an experimental wargame study," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 119-133, January.
    3. Marco Grasso & J. David Tàbara, 2019. "Towards a Moral Compass to Guide Sustainability Transformations in a High-End Climate Change World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Thereza RS de Aguiar, 2018. "Turning accounting for emissions rights inside out as well as upside down," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 139-159, February.
    5. Jennifer Bickham Mendez, 2002. "Organizing a Space of their Own? Global/Local Processes in a Nicaraguan Women’s Organization," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 18(2-3), pages 196-227, June.
    6. Pedi Revecca & Sarri Katerina, 2019. "From the ‘Small but Smart State’ to the ‘Small and Entrepreneurial State’: Introducing a Framework for Effective Small State Strategies within the EU and Beyond," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 3-19, June.
    7. Moch Faisal Karim, 2017. "Integrating European Muslims Through Discourse? Understanding the Development and Limitations of Euro-Islam in Europe," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 993-1011, November.
    8. Kikuta,Kyosuke & Hanayama,Manaho, 2023. "Does the Nobel Peace Prize Improve Women’s Rights? Prize and Praise in International Relations," IDE Discussion Papers 903, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    9. Galaz, V. & de Zeeuw, Aart & Shiroyama, Hideaki & Tripley, Debbie, 2016. "Planetary boundaries : Governing emerging risks and opportunities," Other publications TiSEM 0aebe291-f890-4a2d-9ab7-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Bernhard Boockmann, 2003. "Mixed Motives: An Empirical Analysis of ILO Roll-Call Voting," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 263-285, December.
    11. Neil M. Dawson & Michael Mason & Janet A. Fisher & David Mujasi Mwayafu & Hari Dhungana & Heike Schroeder & Mark Zeitoun, 2018. "Norm Entrepreneurs Sidestep REDD+ in Pursuit of Just and Sustainable Forest Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Eero Palmujoki, 2009. "Global principles for sustainable biofuel production and trade," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 135-151, May.
    13. Kerstin Radtke, 2014. "ASEAN Enlargement and Norm Change – A Window of Opportunity for Democracy and Human Rights Entrepreneurs?," Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 33(3), pages 79-105.
    14. Holzscheiter, Anna & Bahr, Thurid & Pantzerhielm, Laura, 2016. "Emerging Governance Architectures in Global Health: Do Metagovernance Norms Explain Inter-Organisational Convergence?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(3), pages 5-19.
    15. Teresa Kramarz & Susan Park, 2016. "Accountability in Global Environmental Governance: A Meaningful Tool for Action?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, May.
    16. Graham, David & Woods, Ngaire, 2006. "Making corporate self-regulation effective in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 868-883, May.
    17. Andreas Rasche & Wencke Gwozdz & Mathias Lund Larsen & Jeremy Moon, 2022. "Which firms leave multi‐stakeholder initiatives? An analysis of delistings from the United Nations Global Compact," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 309-326, January.
    18. Kristian Berg Harpviken, 2012. "The transnationalization of the Taliban," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 203-229, September.
    19. Wolfgang Wagner, 2017. "Liberal Power Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1398-1414, November.
    20. Mai'a K. Davis Cross, 2015. "The Limits of Epistemic Communities: EU Security Agencies," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 90-100.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:61:y:2024:i:1:p:150-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.