IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ieshis/v46y2019i1p142-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Too Many Children?’ Family Planning and Humanae Vitae in Dublin, 1960–72

Author

Listed:
  • Deirdre Foley

    (Dublin City University, Ireland)

Abstract

In July 1968, the papal encyclical Humanae Vitae reaffirmed the ban on artificial contraception for Catholics. Utilising Dublin as a case study, this article explores how the Irish medical and social work community, their patients and the Catholic hierarchy responded to Humanae Vitae . Drawing on a range of medical and diocesan sources, as well as diverse material from the news media, this article illuminates the change in private behaviour that took place with regard to birth control between 1960 and 1972, and contrasts this behaviour with the public rhetoric and actions of many Catholics in positions of power. Furthermore, it highlights class inequality regarding access to and education on birth control; the health and welfare of working-class women often suffered greatly as a result of multiple births. It is demonstrated that while many exhibited a more liberal shift in their views on the issue of artificial birth control, this was not a straightforward change. A strong, patriarchal network of authority, made up of the Irish Catholic hierarchy and an obeisant section of the medical profession, sought to reaffirm control over Catholic women’s bodies in the wake of Humanae Vitae .

Suggested Citation

  • Deirdre Foley, 2019. "‘Too Many Children?’ Family Planning and Humanae Vitae in Dublin, 1960–72," Transfer: Irish Economic and Social History, , vol. 46(1), pages 142-160, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ieshis:v:46:y:2019:i:1:p:142-160
    DOI: 10.1177/0332489319880677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0332489319880677
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0332489319880677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ieshis:v:46:y:2019:i:1:p:142-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.