IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/asseca/v8y2021i1p98-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

India, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific: Economic–Security Strategic Partnership and Expected Utility Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Neel Vanvari
  • Alexander C. Tan

Abstract

The China–India border dispute has witnessed escalations recently with China making fresh claims along the disputed border and deaths of Indian military personnel. This study examines the likelihood of a strategic partnership between India and Taiwan. We begin by assessing India’s ‘Act East Policy’ and Taiwan’s ‘New Southbound Policy’ for any points of congruence between these two policies. We then propose an expected utility model of India’s decision calculus. Using the theoretical implication of the model, we then examine the likelihood of a strategic partnership along two dimensions—an economic and a defence–security partnership. This study argues that the value added by an economic strategic partnership between the two countries may be substantial, and the likelihood of such a partnership may be significant. However, the likelihood of a defence–security partnership is substantially less in the bilateral sphere, although at the multilateral level there are areas where defence cooperation can occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Neel Vanvari & Alexander C. Tan, 2021. "India, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific: Economic–Security Strategic Partnership and Expected Utility Theory," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 8(1), pages 98-126, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:98-126
    DOI: 10.1177/2347797021992531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2347797021992531
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2347797021992531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:asseca:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:98-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.