IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v17y2022i2p16-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Walking In Mexico City: Sociodemographic Characteristics Of The Pedestrian

Author

Listed:
  • Luis David BERRONES-SANZ

    (Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, México)

Abstract

This study seeks to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of pedestrians and trip variables that affect walking as a transportation mode. The analysis brought together five Origin-Destination Survey 2017 databases that contained data on housing, vehicles per home, persons, transportation mode, and lengths of trips (n=890,740). The data were analyzed through hypothesis testing to examine the association and difference of proportions and averages, and the logistic regression model to identify what variables determine the characteristics of persons who walk. 60.6% (n=322,173) of the walking was carried out on a section of the overall trip; and it was found that, proportionately, the persons who walk the least are male subjects, who have vehicles, who are older, who have a higher sociodemographic and educational level, who travel early in the morning or at night, and when the purpose of the trip is to go to work. The variables that have the strongest influence on the number of times it is likely that a person walks are the location of the home—in which it is up to 2.76 times more likely in rural zones and 2.20 times more likely in city center areas—those who are of a low socioeconomic level (Odds Ratio, OR=2.02), and those who have no formal education (OR=2.19). Therefore, walking as a transportation mode in Mexico City is directly related to low income sociodemographic levels; and for these individuals, it is not a modal option, but rather an imposition, because the zones coincide with the greatest risks of violence and road safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis David BERRONES-SANZ, 2022. "Walking In Mexico City: Sociodemographic Characteristics Of The Pedestrian," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 16-30, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:16-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://um.ase.ro/no172/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Razieh Zandieh & Johannes Flacke & Javier Martinez & Phil Jones & Martin Van Maarseveen, 2017. "Do Inequalities in Neighborhood Walkability Drive Disparities in Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Híjar, Martha & Trostle, James & Bronfman, Mario, 2003. "Pedestrian injuries in Mexico: a multi-method approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 2149-2159, December.
    3. Arlie Adkins & Carrie Makarewicz & Michele Scanze & Maia Ingram & Gretchen Luhr, 2017. "Contextualizing Walkability: Do Relationships Between Built Environments and Walking Vary by Socioeconomic Context?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(3), pages 296-314, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Zang & Fei Xian & Hualong Qiu & Shifa Ma & Hongxu Guo & Mengrui Wang & Linchuan Yang, 2022. "Differences in the Correlation between the Built Environment and Walking, Moderate, and Vigorous Physical Activity among the Elderly in Low- and High-Income Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Marie Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke & Cristhian Figueroa-Martínez & Francisca Parra Huerta & Rodrigo Mora, 2022. "The Disabling City: Older Persons Walking in Central Neighbourhoods of Santiago de Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Liu, Yan & Wang, Siqin & Xie, Bin, 2019. "Evaluating the effects of public transport fare policy change together with built and non-built environment features on ridership: The case in South East Queensland, Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 78-89.
    4. Liu, Jixiang & Xiao, Longzhu, 2023. "Non-linear relationships between built environment and commuting duration of migrants and locals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    5. Battista, Geoffrey A. & Manaugh, Kevin, 2018. "Stores and mores: Toward socializing walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.
    6. Razieh Zandieh & Javier Martinez & Johannes Flacke, 2019. "Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking and Inequalities in Neighbourhood Green Spaces Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Ka-Man Leung & Kai-Ling Ou & Pak-Kwong Chung & Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani, 2021. "Older Adults’ Perceptions toward Walking: A Qualitative Study Using a Social-Ecological Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Valkiria Amaya & Matthias Chardon & Helen Klein & Thibauld Moulaert & Nicolas Vuillerme, 2022. "What Do We Know about the Use of the Walk-along Method to Identify the Perceived Neighborhood Environment Correlates of Walking Activity in Healthy Older Adults: Methodological Considerations Related ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-37, September.
    9. Pereira, Mauro F. & Vale, David S. & Santana, Paula, 2023. "Is walkability equitably distributed across socio-economic groups? – A spatial analysis for Lisbon metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Jixiang Liu & Longzhu Xiao, 2024. "Socioeconomic differences in effect size: predicting commuting mode choice of migrants and locals using a light gradient boosting approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Hei Gao & Zike Xu & Yu Chen & Yutian Lu & Jian Lin, 2022. "Walking Environment and Obesity: A Gender-Specific Association Study in Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Anne-Sophie Travert & Kristi Sidney Annerstedt & Meena Daivadanam, 2019. "Built Environment and Health Behaviors: Deconstructing the Black Box of Interactions—A Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "Off the Grid... and Back Again? The Recent Evolution of American Street Network Planning and Design," Papers 2010.04771, arXiv.org.
    14. Liu, Jixiang & Wang, Bo & Xiao, Longzhu, 2021. "Non-linear associations between built environment and active travel for working and shopping: An extreme gradient boosting approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    15. Valkiria Amaya & Matthias Chardon & Thibauld Moulaert & Nicolas Vuillerme, 2024. "Systematic Review of the Use of the Walk-Along Interview Method to Assess Factors, Facilitators and Barriers Related to Perceived Neighborhood Environment and Walking Activity in Healthy Older Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Aldred, Rachel & Verlinghieri, Ersilia & Sharkey, Megan & Itova, Irena & Goodman, Anna, 2021. "Equity in new active travel infrastructure: A spatial analysis of London's new Low Traffic Neighbourhoods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Bojing Liao & Xiang Li, 2023. "Neighborhood Environment and Affective Walking Experience: Cluster Analysis Results of a Virtual-Environment-Based Conjoint Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Rahman, Mashrur & Sciara, Gian-Claudia, 2022. "Travel attitudes, the built environment and travel behavior relationships: Causal insights from social psychology theories," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 44-54.
    19. Mejia-Dorantes, Lucia, 2018. "An example of working women in Mexico City: How can their vision reshape transport policy?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 97-111.
    20. Ziwen Sun & Ka Yan Lai & Simon Bell & Iain Scott & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2019. "Exploring the Associations of Walking Behavior with Neighborhood Environments by Different Life Stages: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Smaller Chinese City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:16-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.