I revisit the economic analysis of contract law for a setting of cooperative investments. While Che and Chung (1999) have shown that expectation damages perform rather poorly, I argue that this negative result follows from their implicit assumption of unilateral expectation damages. Yet the very nature of cooperative investments gives rise to the possibility that both parties may claim expectation damages. I show that such a regime of bilateral expectation damages provides the incentives for the first-best solution even in a framework of binary choice where, for selfish investments, the traditional overreliance result would hold. Ordering information: This article can be ordered from http://gemini.econ.umd.edu/cgi-bin/rje_online.cgi?action=view&year=2006&issue=spr&page=134.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Oren Bar-Gill & Lucian A. Bebchuk, 2007.
"Consent and Exchange,"
NBER Working Papers
13267, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)