This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Reputation and Product Quality

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
William P. Rogerson
Abstract

This article considers the role that reputation plays in assuring product quality in markets where consumers can only imperfectly judge product quality even after consumption. Three conclusions are derived. First, high quality firms have more customers because they have fewer dissatisfied customers who leave and word-of-mouth advertising results in more arrivals. Second, higher fixed costs can result in a higher equilibrium level of quality. Third, the particular form that word-of-mouth advertising takes can have significant effects on the market outcome. Recommendations consisting of a report of whether the consumer intends to patronize the same firm again generate an externality that is absent when actual estimates of quality are communicated.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0361-915X%28198323%2914%3A2%3C508%3ARAPQ%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U&origin=repec
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by The RAND Corporation in its journal Bell Journal of Economics.

Volume (Year): 14 (1983)
Issue (Month): 2 (Autumn)
Pages: 508-516
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:14:y:1983:i:autumn:p:508-516

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.rje.org

Order Information:
Web: http://gemini.econ.umd.edu/cgi-bin/rje_online.cgi

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, 2004. "Endogenous Market Thickness and Honesty : A Quality Trap Model," Industrial Organization 0408006, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
  2. Roberta Sestini, 2002. "Are You A Doctor Or A Quack? Provision Of Quality And Self-Regulation In A Market For Professional Services," Departmental Working Papers 167, Tor Vergata University, CEIS. [Downloadable!]
  3. William P. Rogerson, 1986. "Advertising as a Signal When Price Guarantees Quality," Discussion Papers 704, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. [Downloadable!]
  4. Rafael Rob, 2004. "Is Bigger Better? Investing in Reputation," Theory workshop papers 658612000000000086, UCLA Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  5. Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, 2005. "Endogenous Market Thickness, Prices and Honesty: Quality Demand Traps," Discussion Papers 05-02, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham. [Downloadable!]
  6. James D. Dana, 2000. "Competition in Price and Availability when Availability is Unobservable," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1450, Econometric Society. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  7. Johannes Hörner, . ""Reputation and Competition''," CARESS Working Papres 99-02, University of Pennsylvania Center for Analytic Research and Economics in the Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
  8. Jean Gabszewicz & Filomena Garcia, 2007. "Optimal Monopoly Price Paths with Expanding Networks," Review of Network Economics, Concept Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 42-49, March. [Downloadable!]
  9. W. Bentley MacLeod, 2006. "Reputations, Relationships and the Enforcement of Incomplete Contracts," IZA Discussion Papers 1978, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  10. William P. Rogerson, 1985. "Price Advertising and the Deterioration of Product Quality," Discussion Papers 707, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science. [Downloadable!]
  11. Morris M. Kleiner & Richard M. Todd, 2007. "Mortgage Broker Regulations That Matter: Analyzing Earnings, Employment, and Outcomes for Consumers," NBER Working Papers 13684, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Theodore Loder & Marshall Van Alstyne & Rick Wash, 2006. "An Economic Response to Unsolicited Communication," Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 6(1), pages 1322-1322. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Jean J., GABSZEWICZ & Filomena, GARCIA, 2005. "A Note on Expanding Networks and Monopoly Pricing," Discussion Papers 2005063, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  14. Gilles Grolleau & Julie A. Caswell, 2005. "Interaction Between Food Attributes in Markets: The Case of Environmental Labeling," Working Papers 2005-5, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Resource Economics. [Downloadable!]
  15. Michael Waldman, 1984. "The Role of Integrity in Economic Interaction," UCLA Economics Working Papers 350, UCLA Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer with RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2008-12-28.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.