IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfh/bbejor/v5y2016i1p37-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Performance Management Indicators on Knowledge Management: An Empirical Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • K. Sivakumar

    (Research Scholar / Management / Research & Development / Bharathiar University- Coimbatore - Tamilnadu –India Professor & Head / Management Studies / Oxford Engineering College - Tiruchirappalli –Tamilnadu – India)

  • S. A. Lourdhuraj

    (Research Supervisor / Management / Research & Development / Bharathiar University- Coimbatore - Tamilnadu –India Associate Professor / Management Studies / Jamal Institute of Management –Tiruchirappalli – Tamilnadu- India)

Abstract

Knowledge Management consists of making sure that the teams and individuals have the know-how they need, to make their task easier and to improve their performance. Knowledge management therefore feeds performance management, and knowledge is also derived from performance. Performance and knowledge management can form a closed loop. As organisations has become increasingly aware that knowledge management is among their most valuable strategic assets, they will be forced to re-evaluate the way in which they engage with the source of that knowledge to underpin their sustainable development. Key indicators that measure the performance of knowledge management integration are needed. They need to measure both effectiveness and efficiency. KM is now an integral part of an organisation’s business processes. The effective implementation of KM strategy needs to measure current performance and guide the organisation toward its changing image of the future. KM and particularly its performance measurement dimension has become the most important economic task for most organisations. This study is based on research conducted in a large construction company. The paper provides an understanding of indicators of performance management that have an effect on knowledge management. The result shows that all indicators of performance management in the study have a positive significant relationship with knowledge management.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Sivakumar & S. A. Lourdhuraj, 2016. "The Effect of Performance Management Indicators on Knowledge Management: An Empirical Investigation," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 5(1), pages 37-43, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:37-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/index.php/BBE/article/view/247/207
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/index.php/BBE/article/view/247
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hesham S. Ahmad & Min An, 2008. "Knowledge management implementation in construction projects: a KM model for Knowledge Creation, Collection and Updating (KCCU)," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 133-166.
    2. Kiessling, Timothy S. & Richey, R. Glenn & Meng, Juan & Dabic, Marina, 2009. "Exploring knowledge management to organizational performance outcomes in a transitional economy," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 421-433, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiessling, Timothy & Maley, Jane Frances & Moeller, Miriam & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Managing global knowledge transfer: Inpatriate manager embeddedness and firm innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    2. Kafouros, Mario I. & Forsans, Nicolas, 2012. "The role of open innovation in emerging economies: Do companies profit from the scientific knowledge of others?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 362-370.
    3. Mihailova, Irina, 2015. "Outcomes of learning through JVs for local parent firms in transition economies: Evidence from Russia," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 220-233.
    4. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2014. "The impact of knowledge management capabilities and supplier relationship management on corporate performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 39-47.
    5. Demetris Vrontis & Jaroslav Belas & Alkis Thrassou & Gabriele Santoro & Michael Christofi, 2023. "Strategic agility, openness and performance: a mixed method comparative analysis of firms operating in developed and emerging markets," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1365-1398, May.
    6. Sajjad Jasimuddin & Jun Li & Nicholas Perdikis, 2015. "Linkage between geographic space and knowledge transfer by multinational enterprises: a structural equation approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 769-795, May.
    7. Snejina Michailova & Elena Sidorova, 2010. "Knowledge Management In Transition Economies: Selected Key Issues And Possible Research Avenues," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 1(1).
    8. Vo Dang Khoa & Thanwadee Chinda, 2023. "Assessment of Construction Competitiveness through Knowledge Management Process Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-33, November.
    9. Nisar Ahmad & Muhammad Saeed Lodhi & Khalid Zaman & Imran Naseem, 2017. "Knowledge Management: a Gateway for Organizational Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 859-876, September.
    10. Eugenie Byukusenge & John C. Munene, 2017. "Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1368434-136, January.
    11. Michailova, Snejina & Mustaffa, Zaidah, 2012. "Subsidiary knowledge flows in multinational corporations: Research accomplishments, gaps, and opportunities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 383-396.
    12. Altaf Hussain & Muhammad Khan & Dilshodjon Alidjonovich Rakhmonov & Zokir Toshtemirovich Mamadiyarov & Mohichexra Turobjonovna Kurbonbekova & Muxlisa Qodirjon Kizi Mahmudova, 2023. "Nexus of Training and Development, Organizational Learning Capability, and Organizational Performance in the Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Cletus Helen Eboh, 2019. "Evaluation of the Conceptual Theories, Elements, and Processes of Knowledge Management in Modern Day Organisations," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 37-54, April.
    14. AKRAM Kashif & HILMAN Haim, 2018. "Effect Of Knowledge Management Activities And Dynamic Capabilities On Employee Performance In The Banking Sector: Empirical Evidence From Pakistan," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 41-60, August.
    15. Sivakumar, K. & Feng, Cong, 2019. "Patterns of product improvements and customer response," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 27-43.
    16. Loon, Mark, 2019. "Knowledge management practice system: Theorising from an international meta-standard," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 432-441.
    17. Domanović Violeta & Janjić Vesna, 2018. "Enterprise Efficiency Sources in the Contemporary Business Environment," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(3), pages 321-334, September.
    18. Ivan Mencer & Lara Jelenc & Valentina Ivancic, 2015. "In Search Of A Clearer Growth Path For Croatian Enterprises," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 24(2), pages 597-626, december.
    19. Dabić, Marina & Stojčić, Nebojša & Simić, Marijana & Potocan, Vojko & Slavković, Marko & Nedelko, Zlatko, 2021. "Intellectual agility and innovation in micro and small businesses: The mediating role of entrepreneurial leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 683-695.
    20. Sohag, Kazi & Badur, Mesut M. & Ameer, Waqar & Vilamová, Šárka, 2024. "Does ICT diffusion validate skill-biased technological change hypothesis? Evidence from the post-Soviet countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Knowledge Management; Performance Management; Training & Development; Consequence based on Performance; Organisation Motivation; Employee Involvement; Assessment & Guidance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • J5 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:37-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.