IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rfreco/rfeco_0769-0479_2002_num_17_1_1455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La dollarisation comme solution en dernier ressort

Author

Listed:
  • Henri Bourguinat
  • Larbi Dohni

Abstract

[eng] Ecuador has recently adopted the US dollar as legal tender. Salvador is on the verge of doing so; Guatemala and Costa-Rica are attempting at the same substitution to their own currency. But, the prospect is now more general. In other parts of the world, the dollarization progresses, too; Eastern-Timor and Kosovo have just before replaced their currency, respectively by the dollar and the mark; Balkanic countries are about to dol- larize ("euroize") their economies. Earlier, the South-African rand was substituted to the Lesotho, Swaziland and Namibie national currencies. Now we are far from the previous straight field of official dollarization. A few years ago, it concerned, except the specific case of Panama [1904], only "microscopic" territories like Pacific Island (Guam, Micronesia, etc.) or little cities as, in Europe, Andorra, Lichtenstein, Monaco or the Vatican. Now, official dollarization is quite another phenomenon. It is often presented as a general formula available to reform the International Monetary System (IMS). This solution is now proposed to replace a lot of currencies eroded by inflation, deficits, political crisis, if not by revolts and ethnic troubles. Initially, it seems quite logical to try to replace "minor currencies" by a few number of foreign currencies well identified by the markets and more credible. The main argument of this paper is precisely to discuss this prospect of dollarization used to simplify and rationalize the IMS. Before adopting this view, which seems too optimistic, it would be necessary to consider: - The sound and specific nature of dollarization as a "borrowing contact of credibility in the last resort". —The interest in dollarization, relatively to other exchange rate arrangements like Monetary Unions or Currency Boards. —A cost-benefits analysis of this substitution of a foreign currency to a local one. —An application of the dollarization formula to the Canadian dollar and Eastern Central European countries. [fre] L'Equateur a récemment donné cours légal au dollar. Le Salvador est sur le point de faire de même. Le Guatemala et le Costa-Rica sont également tentés. Mais la perspective est beaucoup plus générale. Dans d'autres parties du monde, la dollarisation progresse (le Timor oriental et le Kosovo ont remplacé leur monnaie par le dollar et le mark) ; les pays balkaniques aussi se « dollarisent » ou « s'euroisent » ; il y a quelques années, le rand sud-africain fut aussi substitué aux monnaies locales de la Namibie, du Lesotho et du Swaziland. Quelques années auparavant, la dollarisation, excepté le cas du Panama [1904], ne concernait que des territoires microscopiques ou de petites cités en Europe, comme les principautés d'Andorre, du Liechtenstein, de Monaco ou le Vatican. Le champ de la dollarisation est donc en train de s'élargir considérablement. La formule est même présentée comme un moyen général de réformer le système monétaire International. Pourquoi, dit-on, ne pas remplacer toute une série de monnaies « mineures » érodées par l'inflation, les déficits, les crises politiques quand ce n'est les révoltes ou troubles ethniques, par un petit nombre de monnaies bien identifiées par les marchés et plus crédibles ? Avant d'adopter cette vue qui paraît trop optimiste (la dollarisation est une solution « en dernier ressort »), il est nécessaire de considérer : —la nature profonde et spécifique de la dollarisation en tant que contrat d'emprunt de crédibilité ; —l'intérêt de la dollarisation par rapport aux autres régimes de change (unions monétaires et caisses d'émission) ; —une analyse coût-bénéfice de la formule ; —une application aux cas du dollar canadien et des pays d'Europe centrale et orientale.

Suggested Citation

  • Henri Bourguinat & Larbi Dohni, 2002. "La dollarisation comme solution en dernier ressort," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 17(1), pages 57-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2002_num_17_1_1455
    DOI: 10.3406/rfeco.2002.1455
    Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.2002.1455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/rfeco.2002.1455
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfeco_0769-0479_2002_num_17_1_1455
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/rfeco.2002.1455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillermo A. Calvo & Carmen M. Reinhart, 2002. "Fear of Floating," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(2), pages 379-408.
    2. Francois R. Velde & Marcelo Veracierto, 2000. "Dollarization in Argentina," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 24(Q I), pages 24-37.
    3. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1999. "No Single Currency Regime is Right for All Countries or At All Times," NBER Working Papers 7338, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Roger Craine., 2001. "Dollarization: An Irreversible Decision," Economics Working Papers E01-298, University of California at Berkeley.
    5. Roger Craine, 2001. "Dollarization: An Irreversible Decision," International Finance 0103003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Schor, Armand-Denis, 2000. "La théorie des zones monétaires optimales : l’optimum, le praticable, le crédible et le réel," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 76(4), pages 545-576, décembre.
    7. Craine, Roger, 2001. "Dollarization: An Irreversible Decision," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt404915zn, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    8. Kydland, Finn E & Prescott, Edward C, 1977. "Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(3), pages 473-491, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alain Raybaut & Dominique Torre, 2004. "Unions monétaires, caisses d'émission et dollarisation : les fondements analytiques des systèmes de change « ultra-fixes »," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 75(2), pages 37-54.
    2. Chrysost Bangake & Jean-Baptiste Desquilbet & Nabil Jedlane, 2006. "Régimes de change pour les petits pays," Post-Print halshs-00225016, HAL.
    3. Anastasia Melachrinos & Christian Pfister, 2020. "Stablecoins: A Brave New World?," Working papers 757, Banque de France.
    4. Le Maux, Laurent, 2003. "Dollarisation officielle : analyse critique et alternative," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 79(3), pages 367-391, Septembre.
    5. Sokic, Alexandre & FABRIS, Nikola, 2013. "Euroization and cyclical stabilization in Montenegro: an empirical analysis," MPRA Paper 46537, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. MALINGUMU, Crispin, 2015. "DEDOLLARISATION DE L’ECONOMIE CONGOLAISE : Atouts, contraintes et perspectives [Congolese's Economy dedollarization: strengths, constraints and prospects]," MPRA Paper 81932, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 12 Jun 2015.
    7. Alexandre Minda, 2005. "La dollarisation intégrale : une option monétaire de dernier ressort pour l'Amérique latine ?," Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 130(2), pages 15-39.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Bonilla‐Bolaños, 2021. "A step further in the theory of regional integration: A look at the South American integration strategy," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 845-873, July.
    2. Piersanti, Giovanni, 2012. "The Macroeconomic Theory of Exchange Rate Crises," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199653126.
    3. Giancarlo Marini & Giovanni Piersanti, 2012. "Models of Speculative Attacks and Crashes in International Capital Markets," CEIS Research Paper 245, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 24 Jul 2012.
    4. Igor Da Silva Veiga & Helder Ferreira De Mendonça, 2014. "Financial Openness And Inflationtargeting: An Analysis For The Unpleasant Fiscal Arithmetic," Anais do XL Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 40th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 059, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    5. Alexis Cruz-Rodriguez, 2013. "Choosing and Assessing Exchange Rate Regimes: a Survey of the Literature," Revista de Analisis Economico – Economic Analysis Review, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business, vol. 28(2), pages 37-61, October.
    6. de Mendonça, Helder Ferreira & da Silva Veiga, Igor, 2014. "A Note On Openness And Inflation Targeting: Implications For The Unpleasant Fiscal Arithmetic," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 1187-1207, July.
    7. Mashkoor, Asim & Ahmed, Ovais & Herani, Dr. Gobin, 2015. "The relationship between Foreign Currency trading and Economic Development: A case Study of Pakistan," MPRA Paper 64482, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Kamal, Mona, 2010. "الإطار النظرى للتنسيق بين السياستين المالية والنقدية [The Theoretical Framework for the Coordination of Fiscal and Monetary Polices]," MPRA Paper 26856, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Gaetano Antinolfi & Todd Keister, 2001. "Dollarization as a monetary arrangement for emerging market economies," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 83(Nov.), pages 29-40.
    10. Ramon Moreno, 2001. "Pegging and stabilization policy in developing countries," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 17-29.
    11. Yen Kyun Wang, 2008. "Flexible BBC Exchange Rate System and Exchange Rate Cooperation in East Asia," Trade Working Papers 21802, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    12. Lin, Shu, 2006. "Does it pay to go to the corners? An empirical evaluation of the bipolar view of exchange rate regimes," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 342-347, September.
    13. Jamus Jerome Lim, 2021. "The limits of central bank independence for inflation performance," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 309-335, March.
    14. Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira & Marcio Holland, 2009. "Common currency and economic integration in Mercosul," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 213-234, December.
    15. Ferdinand Owoundi & Jacques Landry Bikai, 2021. "On the neutrality of the exchange rate regime regarding real misalignments: Evidence from sub‐Saharan Africa," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(3), pages 327-345, July.
    16. Mr. Andrea Bubula & Ms. Inci Ötker, 2002. "The Evolution of Exchange Rate Regimes Since 1990: Evidence From De Facto Policies," IMF Working Papers 2002/155, International Monetary Fund.
    17. Robert-Paul Berben & Jan Marc Berk, 2002. "Requirements for successful currency regimes: the Dutch and Thai experiences," MEB Series (discontinued) 2002-16, Netherlands Central Bank, Monetary and Economic Policy Department.
    18. Levy Yeyati, Eduardo & Sturzenegger, Federico & Reggio, Iliana, 2010. "On the endogeneity of exchange rate regimes," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 659-677, July.
    19. Michael B. Devereux, 2001. "Financial Constraints and Exchange Rate Flexibility in Emerging Market Economies," Working Papers 152001, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.
    20. Guillermo Ortiz, 2000. "How should monetary policymakers react to the new challenges of global economic integration: commentary," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 255-276.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2002_num_17_1_1455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/rfeco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.