IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_1999_num_326_1_6226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investissement direct à l'étranger et échanges extérieurs : un impact plus fort aux États-Unis qu'en France

Author

Listed:
  • Lionel Fontagné
  • Michaël Pajot

Abstract

[eng] Direct Investment and French Firms France's direct investment has shot up since the mid-1 980s. The OECD reports that France was the, number four investment recipient country and the number five investor country in 1997. France starting catching up in the second half of the 1 980s and is now at the top of the list of the most dynamic countries in terms of direct investment. In common with the other developed countries, it invests mainly in the OECD zone despite that fact that its share of investment in Asia and Latin America : has risen considerably since the beginning of the decade. . Foreign direct investment in France comes mainly from the developed countries. For the most part, it concerns high i value-added industrial sectors such as electronics and . parachemicals. The market tertiary sector and services in particular are a central focus for French direct investment, accounting for over two-thirds of total investment. France likewise invests a great deal in these sectors abroad, especially in business services. French international corporations - French firms = controlled by a foreign investor or French firms controlling at least, one subsidiary abroad - stand out, at microeconomic level. They employ a more highly skilled, productive and better paid workforce. Their margins are higher than their national competitors in all sectors and they make larger profits in industry. They also export more. However, they have higher gearing and need more funds to face the risks they run. In general, they are not more profitable. These performance differences narrow, but. persist, when membership of a group and the job's qualifications structure are included in with size and activity sector. [ger] Direktinvestitionen im Ausland und AuBenhandel: mehr Auswirkungen in den Vereinigten Staaten als in Frankreich Die Direktinvestitionen im Ausland (DIA) und die. Geschâftstâtigkeit multinationaler Unternehmen im Ausland nehmen in raschem Tempo zu. Solche Investitionen kônnen unmittelbar an die Stelle des Handels treten, da die Exporte durch den Vertrieb vor Ort der im Ausland errichteten Tochtergesellschaften ersetzt werden. Sie kônnen aber auch die Wettbewerbsfâhigkeit der betreffenden Firmen auf dem Aufnahmemarkt verbessern und dadurch die Ausfuhren der investierenden Lânder fôrdern, so daB die DIA den Welthandel ergànzen. Von der Substitution (mit negativen Folgen fur die Geschâftstâtigkeit der Firma oder des Wirtschaftszweigs = im Herkunftsland) bis hin zur Komplementaritàt (mit im Gegenteil positiven Folgen) kônnen zahlreiche Zwischensituationen je nach der gewâhlten Analyseebene - mikro- oder makroôkonomische . Ebene auftreten: im letzteren Falle eine mehr oder weniger umfassende Untergliederung der Wirtschaftssystematiken, auf deren Grundlage die- Investitionen und Handelstàtigkeiten erfa8t werden. Auf mikroôkonomischer Ebene wûrde der Substitutionseffekt vorherrschen: die DlAwùrden fur das Unternehmen eine Alternative zum Gûterhandel. darstellen, insbesondere im Falle hoher Transportkosten. Dagegen wûrde auf makroôkonomischer Ebene der, Ankurbelungseffekt bei den Ausfuhren voll zum Tragen kommen, was dem Mundell-Substitutionsgrundsatz widerspricht. Die Kontroverse besteht allerdings fort, mit alien ihren bedeutenden Konsequenzen im Hinblick auf die Herkunfts- und Aufnahmewirtschaften der Investitionen. Eine Datenbank iiber den Handel und die DIA zwischen 1984 und 1994 kann zur Beantwortung einiger Fragen beitragen, indem im Falle Frankreichs und der Vereinigten Staaten die Beziehungen zwischen den Exporten, den. Importen und dem Saldo der Handelsbilanz einerseits und den DIAandererseits getestet werden. Daraus ergibt sich, daB die Outward-DIAeine viel stàrkere Auswirkung auf den Handel der Vereinigten Staaten haben. Substitutionseffekte lassen sich durch die Ausfuhren, die durch die DIA gefôrdert werden, in anderen Branchen kompensieren (Stimulationseffekt). Die DIAeines Industriezweigs stimulieren dessen Exporte in gleicher Weise wie diejenigen der restlichen Industrie; und dieser Ankurbelungseffekt ist bei den Direktinvestitionen, die in Frankreich von auslândischen Unternehmen getàtigt werden, noch ausgeprâgter. In den Vereinigten Staaten tragen die DIA- ganz gleich, ob es sich um inwards oder outwards handelt - zur Erhôhung des Handelsdefizits bei. Auf die Handelsbilanz wirken sich schlieBlich die Inward-DIAim Durchschnitt negativer als die Outward-DIAaus. [spa] Inversiones directas en el extranjero e intercambios exteriores : un impacto mayor en los Estados Unidos que en Francia a las exportaciones. También pueden aumentar la competitividad de estas firmas en el paîs de acogida y contribuir de este modo a favorecer las exportaciones procedentes del paîs inversor : la IDE es entonces el La inversion directa en el extranjero (IDE) y la actividad extranjera de las firmas multinacionales se van desarrollando a un buen ritmo. Taies inversiones son capaces de sustituirse directamente a los intercambios, ya que las ventas locales de las sucursales se sustituyen complemento de los intercambios internacionales. De la sustituciôn (cuyas consecuencias son negativas para la actividad de la firma o del sector econômico en el paîs de salida) a la complementariedad (cuyas consecuencias al contrario son positivas),' muchas son las situaciones- intermediarias con las que nos podemos encontrar, segûn el nivel de anâlisis escogido : micro o macroeconômico, y en este caso segûn las nomenclaturas de actividad mas o . menos pormenorizadas con las que se van considerando la inversion y los intercambios. .. A un nivel microeconômico, predominarfa el efecto de sustituciôn : la IDE séria para la firma una alternativa a los ■. intercambios de aquellos bienes que suponen altos costes detransporte. A la inversa, a nivel macroeconômico, el efecto de entrenamiento sobre las

Suggested Citation

  • Lionel Fontagné & Michaël Pajot, 1999. "Investissement direct à l'étranger et échanges extérieurs : un impact plus fort aux États-Unis qu'en France," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 326(1), pages 71-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1999_num_326_1_6226
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.1999.6226
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.1999.6226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.1999.6226
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_1999_num_326_1_6226
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.1999.6226?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drabek, Zdenek, 1998. "A multilateral agreement on investment: Convincing the sceptics," WTO Staff Working Papers ERAD-98-05, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Corinne Barlet, 1992. "Commerce international et différenciation des produits : un arbitrage entre exportation et investissement direct," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 102(1), pages 55-65.
    3. Borensztein, E. & De Gregorio, J. & Lee, J-W., 1998. "How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?1," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 115-135, June.
    4. Eaton Jonathan & Tamura Akiko, 1994. "Bilateralism and Regionalism in Japanese and U.S. Trade and Direct Foreign Investment Patterns," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 478-510, December.
    5. René Belderbos, 1992. "Large multinational enterprises based in a small economy: Effects on domestic investment," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 128(3), pages 543-557, September.
    6. Paul Brenton & Francesca Di Mauro & Matthias Lücke, 2014. "Economic Integration and FDI: An Empirical Analysis off Foreign Investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: INTERNATIONAL TRADE, DISTRIBUTION AND DEVELOPMENT Empirical Studies of Trade Policies, chapter 7, pages 125-151, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Ronald Findlay, 1978. "Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 92(1), pages 1-16.
    8. S. Lael Brainard, 1993. "An Empirical Assessment of the Factor Proportions Explanation of Multi-National Sales," NBER Working Papers 4583, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Magnus Blomstrom & Ari Kokko, 1994. "Home Country Effects of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Sweden," NBER Working Papers 4639, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Lipsey, Robert E & Weiss, Merle Yahr, 1984. "Foreign Production and Exports of Individual Firms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 66(2), pages 304-308, May.
    11. Magnus Blomstrom & Robert E. Lipsey & Ksenia Kulchycky, 1988. "U.S. and Swedish Direct Investment and Exports," NBER Chapters, in: Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis, pages 257-302, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Stevens, Guy V. G. & Lipsey, Robert E., 1992. "Interactions between domestic and foreign investment," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 40-62, February.
    13. Helpman, Elhanan, 1984. "A Simple Theory of International Trade with Multinational Corporations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 92(3), pages 451-471, June.
    14. Palle S. Andersen & P. Hainaut, 1998. "Foreign direct investment and employment in the industrial countries," BIS Working Papers 61, Bank for International Settlements.
    15. Lionel Fontagné & Michael Frudenberg & Nicolas Péridy, 1998. "Commerce international et structures de marché : une vérification empirique," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 135(4), pages 147-167.
    16. Lionel Fontagné & Michaël Pajot, 1997. "How Foreign Direct Investment Affects International Trade and Competitiveness: an Empirical Assessment," Working Papers 1997-17, CEPII research center.
    17. James R. Markusen & Anthony J. Venables, 2021. "Multinational firms and the new trade theory," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: BROADENING TRADE THEORY Incorporating Market Realities into Traditional Models, chapter 3, pages 47-67, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    18. Lionel Fontagné & Michaël Pajot & Michael Freudenberg, 1999. "Le potentiel d'échanges entre l'Union européenne et les PECO. Un réexamen," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 50(6), pages 1139-1168.
    19. S. Lael Brainard, 1993. "An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Tradeoff between Multinational Sales and Trade," NBER Working Papers 4580, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raphaël Chiappini, 2016. "Do overseas investments create or replace trade? New insights from a macro-sectoral study on Japan," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 403-425, June.
    2. Dhaoui, Elwardi, 2013. "Impact social des délocalisations: mythe ou réalité? [Social impact of offshoring: myth or reality?]," MPRA Paper 63684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Mariem Brahim & Sébastien Dupuch, 2016. "Foreign direct investments in Europe: are the East-West differences still so noticeable?," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 13(1), pages 37-61, June.
    4. Leandro Rothmuller, 2003. "Does FDI Matter for Trade in Brazil? An Application of the Gravity Model," Anais do XXXI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 31st Brazilian Economics Meeting] c71, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    5. Lionel Fontagné & Michaël Pajot & Jean-Michel Pasteels, 2002. "Potentiels de commerce entre économies hétérogènes : un petit mode d'emploi des modèles de gravité," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(1), pages 115-139.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James R. Markusen & Keith E. Maskus, 2001. "General-Equilibrium Approaches to the Multinational Firm: A Review of Theory and Evidence," NBER Working Papers 8334, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ana Paula Africano & Manuela Magalhaes, 2005. "FDI and Trade in Portugal: a gravity analysis," FEP Working Papers 174, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    3. Pontus Braunerhjelm & Lars Oxelheim, 2000. "Does Foreign Direct Investment Replace Home Country Investment? The Effect of European Integration on the Location of Swedish Investment," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 199-221, June.
    4. Manuela Magalhães & Ana Paula Africano, 2007. "A Panel Analysis of the FDI Impact on International Trade," NIPE Working Papers 6/2007, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    5. Amiti, Mary & Wakelin, Katharine, 2003. "Investment liberalization and international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 101-126, October.
    6. Elvira Sapienza, 2009. "The interaction between Export and FDI: Central-Eastern Europe and EU15," Quaderni DSEMS 13-2009, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Matematiche e Statistiche, Universita' di Foggia.
    7. Resmini, Laura & Siedschlag, Iulia, 2013. "Is foreign direct investment to China crowding out the foreign direct investment to other countries?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Braunerhjelm, Pontus & Oxelheim, Lars & Thulin, Per, 2005. "The relationship between domestic and outward foreign direct investment: The role of industry-specific effects," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 677-694, December.
    9. Müller, Thomas, 2003. "The Multinational Enterprise," Munich Dissertations in Economics 799, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    10. Martin Falk & Mariya Hake, 2008. "A Panel Data Analysis on FDI and Exports," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 34229.
    11. M.T. Alguacil & V. Orts, "undated". "A multivariate cointegrated model testing for temporal causality between exports and outward FDI: The Spanish case," Studies on the Spanish Economy 50, FEDEA.
    12. Andrzej Cieślik, 2020. "What attracts multinational enterprises from the new EU member states to Poland?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(2), pages 253-269, June.
    13. Raphaël Chiappini, 2016. "Do overseas investments create or replace trade? New insights from a macro-sectoral study on Japan," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 403-425, June.
    14. Markusen, James R. & Venables, Anthony J. & Eby Konan, Denise & Zhang, Kevin H., 1996. "A Unified Treatment of Horizontal Direct Investment, Vertical Direct Investment, and the Pattern of Trade in Goods and Services," Working Paper Series 465, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    15. Oscar Bajo-Rubio & María Montero-Muñoz, 2001. "Foreign Direct Investment and Trade: A Causality Analysis," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 305-323, July.
    16. Jonathan Eaton & Akiko Tamura, 1996. "Japanese and U.S. Exports and Investment as Conduits of Growth," NBER Chapters, in: Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia, pages 51-75, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. James R. Markusen & Keith E. Maskus, 2001. "Multinational Firms: Reconciling Theory and Evidence," NBER Chapters, in: Topics in Empirical International Economics: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert E. Lipsey, pages 71-98, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Wilfried Altzinger & Peter Egger & Peter Huber & Kurt Kratena & Michael Pfaffermayr & Michael Wüger, 2000. "Teilprojekt 5: Transnationale Direktinvestitionen und Kooperationen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 19587.
    19. Isabel Faeth, 2009. "Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment – A Tale Of Nine Theoretical Models," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 165-196, February.
    20. Eduardo Levy Yeyati & Christian Daude & Ernesto Stein, 2003. "Regional Integration and the Location of FDI," Business School Working Papers doce, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_1999_num_326_1_6226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.