IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2015y2015i2id420p19-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Relationship between the Natural Sciences and the Humanities: Brockman's Concept of the "Third Culture" and its Criticism
[K problematice vztahu přírodních a humanitních věd: Brockmanovo pojetí "třetí kultury" a jeho kritika]

Author

Listed:
  • Libor Benda

Abstract

The subject of this paper is an analysis of a recently proposed solution to the so-called two cultures problem, which was formulated in 1959 by Charles Percy Snow - the so-called third culture introduced by John Brockman in his eponymous book. My aim is to critically evaluate Brockman's concept of the "third culture" and to propose arguments supporting the view that it does not really represent a true solution to the two cultures problem but on the contrary illustrates a prevalent existence and actuality of the problem. For this purpose the study makes use of the concept of trading zones, introduced by philosopher and historian Peter Galison to describe and explain possible ways of interaction and mutual understanding between scientists from incommensurable scientific disciplines. As I try to demonstrate, this concept can be successfully applied in a very similar way on the problem of communication between natural sciences and humanities as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Libor Benda, 2015. "On the Relationship between the Natural Sciences and the Humanities: Brockman's Concept of the "Third Culture" and its Criticism [K problematice vztahu přírodních a humanitních věd: Brock," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 19-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2015:y:2015:i:2:id:420:p:19-29
    DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.420.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.420.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.e-logos.420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2015:y:2015:i:2:id:420:p:19-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.