IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v12y2024i3p654-666id3746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting learning outcomes from problem-based learning

Author

Listed:
  • Agung Listiadi

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to examine and compare the educational achievements between problem-based learning and discovery learning approaches in the field of accounting. Understanding the concept is an important part of the process of learning and solving problems, both in the learning process itself and in day-to-day environments. Research using a quantitative method with an experimental approach is a true experimental design. The model of the experiment is the pretest-posttest control group design. According to earlier studies have shown that student’s learn better through discovery learning (DL). It is evident that both methods contribute to the improvement of student outcomes. Being active, thinking critically, and increasing learner achievement are essential factors in the process of learning. In this study, it was discovered that the learning outcomes of problem-based learning models and discovery learning have notable disparities, with problem-based learning producing better learning outcomes. The conclusions from the study offer suggestions or input that can be conveyed and considered for future research. Schools should consider applying a problem-based learning (PBL) model. Students using PBL are required to find their own answers to problems by using their own thinking abilities to form a concept about the material being studied, so during learning activities, students will use their thinking abilities to the maximum.

Suggested Citation

  • Agung Listiadi, 2024. "Accounting learning outcomes from problem-based learning," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 12(3), pages 654-666.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:654-666:id:3746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3746/8118
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:654-666:id:3746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.