IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v31y2018i2p638-677..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Subsidization in Institutional Asset Management Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ranadeb Chaudhuri
  • Zoran Ivković
  • Charles Trzcinka

Abstract

We study cross-subsidization among U.S. equity products managed by institutional asset management firms. We find returns-based evidence consistent with both cross-subsidization receipt by strong recent performers that are relatively small in their firms and provision by products that are relatively large in their firms. Tax-exempt investors and taxable investors do not have a clear ranking by expertise, but tax-exempt investors’ agency issues are more complex. Accordingly, taxable clients have more flow-performance nonlinearity and receive more (and provide less) cross-subsidization. Taxable investor flows appear more discerning, but only under the circumstances conducive to cross-subsidization, suggesting that “more discerning” likely means “more cross-subsidized.”Received May 11, 2015; editorial decision April 22, 2017 by Editor Andrew Karolyi.

Suggested Citation

  • Ranadeb Chaudhuri & Zoran Ivković & Charles Trzcinka, 2018. "Cross-Subsidization in Institutional Asset Management Firms," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(2), pages 638-677.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:31:y:2018:i:2:p:638-677.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhx075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Azi Ben-Rephael & Ryan D Israelsen, 2018. "Are Some Clients More Equal Than Others? An Analysis of Asset Management Companies’ Execution Costs [An analysis of trade-size clustering and its relation to stealth trading]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 22(5), pages 1705-1736.
    2. Kräussl, Roman & Rinne, Kalle & Sunc, Huizhu, 2023. "Does family matter? Venture capital cross-fund cash flows," CFS Working Paper Series 695, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    3. Mark Grinblatt & Gergana Jostova & Lubomir Petrasek & Alexander Philipov, 2020. "Style and Skill: Hedge Funds, Mutual Funds, and Momentum," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5505-5531, December.
    4. Hendriock, Mario, 2020. "Implied cost of capital and mutual fund performance," CFR Working Papers 20-11, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    5. Wang, Xiaoxiao, 2023. "Bank affiliation and mutual funds’ trading strategy distinctiveness," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:31:y:2018:i:2:p:638-677.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.