IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i6p1123-1132..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triparental ageing in a laboratory population of an insect with maternal care
[Male age alone predicts paternity success under sperm competition when effects of age and past mating effort are experimentally separated]

Author

Listed:
  • Hilary Cope
  • Edward R Ivimey-Cook
  • Jacob Moorad

Abstract

Parental age at reproduction influences offspring size and survival by affecting prenatal and postnatal conditions in a wide variety of species, including humans. However, most investigations into this manifestation of ageing focus upon maternal age effects; the effects of paternal age and interactions between maternal and paternal age are often neglected. Furthermore, even when maternal age effects are studied, pre- and post-natal effects are often confounded. Using a cross-fostered experimental design, we investigated the joint effects of pre-natal paternal and maternal and post-natal maternal ages on five traits related to offspring outcomes in a laboratory population of a species of burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. We found a significant positive effect of the age of the egg producer on larval survival to dispersal. We found more statistical evidence for interaction effects, which acted on larval survival and egg length. Both interaction effects were negative and involved the age of the egg-producer, indicating that age-related pre-natal maternal improvements were mitigated by increasing age in fathers and foster mothers. These results agree with an early study that found little evidence for maternal senescence, but it emphasizes that parental age interactions may be an important contributor to ageing patterns. We discuss how the peculiar life history of this species may promote selection to resist the evolution of parental age effects, and how this might have influenced our ability to detect senescence.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilary Cope & Edward R Ivimey-Cook & Jacob Moorad, 2022. "Triparental ageing in a laboratory population of an insect with maternal care [Male age alone predicts paternity success under sperm competition when effects of age and past mating effort are exper," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1123-1132.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:6:p:1123-1132.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric J. Billman & J. Curtis Creighton & Mark C. Belk, 2014. "Prior experience affects allocation to current reproduction in a burying beetle," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 813-818.
    2. Augustine Kong & Michael L. Frigge & Gisli Masson & Soren Besenbacher & Patrick Sulem & Gisli Magnusson & Sigurjon A. Gudjonsson & Asgeir Sigurdsson & Aslaug Jonasdottir & Adalbjorg Jonasdottir & Wend, 2012. "Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7412), pages 471-475, August.
    3. Brian T. Preston & Michel Saint Jalme & Yves Hingrat & Frederic Lacroix & Gabriele Sorci, 2015. "The sperm of aging male bustards retards their offspring’s development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, May.
    4. Owen R. Jones & Alexander Scheuerlein & Roberto Salguero-Gómez & Carlo Giovanni Camarda & Ralf Schaible & Brenda B. Casper & Johan P. Dahlgren & Johan Ehrlén & María B. García & Eric S. Menges & Pedro, 2014. "Diversity of ageing across the tree of life," Nature, Nature, vol. 505(7482), pages 169-173, January.
    5. Francesca E Gray & Jon Richardson & Tom Ratz & Per T Smiseth, 2018. "No evidence for parent–offspring competition in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1142-1149.
    6. Richard J.S. Ward & Sheena C. Cotter & Rebecca M. Kilner, 2009. "Current brood size and residual reproductive value predict offspring desertion in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1274-1281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fiona A. Hagenbeek & Jana S. Hirzinger & Sophie Breunig & Susanne Bruins & Dmitry V. Kuznetsov & Kirsten Schut & Veronika V. Odintsova & Dorret I. Boomsma, 2023. "Maximizing the value of twin studies in health and behaviour," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 849-860, June.
    2. Aburto, José Manuel & Basellini, Ugofilippo & Baudisch, Annette & Villavicencio, Francisco, 2022. "Drewnowski’s index to measure lifespan variation: Revisiting the Gini coefficient of the life table," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Jörn Bethune & April Kleppe & Søren Besenbacher, 2022. "A method to build extended sequence context models of point mutations and indels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Laura Carbonell-Hernández & Diego Pastor & Alejandro Jiménez-Loaisa & Juan Arturo Ballester-Ferrer & Carlos Montero-Carretero & Eduardo Cervelló, 2020. "Lack of Correlation between Accelerometers and Heart-Rate Monitorization during Exercise Session in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Stefano Giaimo & Arne Traulsen, 2022. "The selection force weakens with age because ageing evolves and not vice versa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    6. Giaimo, Stefano, 2022. "Selection on age-specific survival: Constant versus fluctuating environment," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 136-149.
    7. Kitty Sherwood & Joseph C. Ward & Ignacio Soriano & Lynn Martin & Archie Campbell & Raheleh Rahbari & Ioannis Kafetzopoulos & Duncan Sproul & Andrew Green & Julian R. Sampson & Alan Donaldson & Kai-Re, 2023. "Germline de novo mutations in families with Mendelian cancer syndromes caused by defects in DNA repair," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Wafeeq Abdelaziz, Asmaa & Ibrahim Abdelmageed, Reham, 2021. "An overview of non-genetic intellectual disability among Egyptian children and adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    9. Krish Sanghvi & Regina Vega-Trejo & Shinichi Nakagawa & Samuel J. L. Gascoigne & Sheri L. Johnson & Roberto Salguero-Gómez & Tommaso Pizzari & Irem Sepil, 2024. "Meta-analysis shows no consistent evidence for senescence in ejaculate traits across animals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Carlo Giovanni Camarda, 2019. "Smooth constrained mortality forecasting," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(38), pages 1091-1130.
    11. Francesca E Gray & Jon Richardson & Tom Ratz & Per T Smiseth, 2018. "No evidence for parent–offspring competition in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1142-1149.
    12. Yifan Yang & Omer Karin & Avi Mayo & Xiaohu Song & Peipei Chen & Ana L. Santos & Ariel B. Lindner & Uri Alon, 2023. "Damage dynamics and the role of chance in the timing of E. coli cell death," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Christina Bohk & Roland Rau & Joel E. Cohen, 2015. "Taylor's power law in human mortality," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(21), pages 589-610.
    14. Jos'e Manuel Aburto & Ugofilippo Basellini & Annette Baudisch & Francisco Villavicencio, 2021. "Drewnowski's index to measure lifespan variation: Revisiting the Gini coefficient of the life table," Papers 2111.11256, arXiv.org.
    15. Patricia R. Pitrez & Luis M. Monteiro & Oliver Borgogno & Xavier Nissan & Jerome Mertens & Lino Ferreira, 2024. "Cellular reprogramming as a tool to model human aging in a dish," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Marie Bernkopf & Ummi B. Abdullah & Stephen J. Bush & Katherine A. Wood & Sahar Ghaffari & Eleni Giannoulatou & Nils Koelling & Geoffrey J. Maher & Loïc M. Thibaut & Jonathan Williams & Edward M. Blai, 2023. "Personalized recurrence risk assessment following the birth of a child with a pathogenic de novo mutation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Emily M. Bertucci-Richter & Benjamin B. Parrott, 2023. "The rate of epigenetic drift scales with maximum lifespan across mammals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    18. Stephanie M. Bilinovich & Kristy Lewis & Barbara L. Thompson & Jeremy W. Prokop & Daniel B. Campbell, 2020. "Environmental Epigenetics of Diesel Particulate Matter Toxicogenomics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Dang Ton Nguyen & Hai Ha Nguyen & Thuy Duong Nguyen & Thi Thanh Hoa Nguyen & Kaoru Nakano & Kazuhiro Maejima & Aya Sasaki-Oku & Van Ba Nguyen & Duy Bac Nguyen & Bach Quang Le & Jing Hao Wong & Tatsuhi, 2018. "Whole Genome Sequencing of a Vietnamese Family from a Dioxin Contamination Hotspot Reveals Novel Variants in the Son with Undiagnosed Intellectual Disability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, November.
    20. Tsuzuki, Yoichi & Takada, Takenori & Ohara, Masashi, 2022. "Modeling temporal dynamics of genetic diversity in stage-structured plant populations with reference to demographic genetic structure," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 76-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:6:p:1123-1132.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.