IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v81y1999i2p321-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Self-Protection from Nitrate-Contaminated Groundwater

Author

Listed:
  • Richard C. Ready
  • Kimberly Henken

Abstract

Self-protection by well owners from potential nitrate contamination is modeled as an optimal stopping problem, where an owner sequentially tests the well and uses the test results to update his or her subjective probability that the well is contaminated. Because nitrate concentrations in a well vary over time, a single test contains limited information about whether the well is contaminated. The optimal self-protection strategy may therefore involve multiple tests or may not involve any tests at all. For Kentucky wells, optimal self-protection reduces a well owner's expected damage from nitrate contamination by 38%, relative to taking no action. Copyright 1999, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard C. Ready & Kimberly Henken, 1999. "Optimal Self-Protection from Nitrate-Contaminated Groundwater," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(2), pages 321-334.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:81:y:1999:i:2:p:321-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1244584
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mukherjee, Sacchidananda, 2008. "Factors influencing farmers\u2019 willingness to protect groundwater from nonpoint source of pollution in the Lower Bhavani River Basin, Tamil Nadu," Conference Papers h041886, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Tun Lin & Timo Goeschl, 2004. "Biodiversity Conservation on Private Lands: Information Problems and Regulatory Choices," Working Papers 2004.55, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:81:y:1999:i:2:p:321-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.