IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2012i2p722-725.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Gratuitousness A Reason For Joining An Educational Master Programme In Audit? Survey Evidence Using Statistical Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Span Georgeta AncuNa

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

  • Popa Irimie Emil

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

  • Mare Codruta

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

  • Dragos Cristian

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

Abstract

The study shows the reasons taken into account by the students in choosing an academic preparation. Free courses and employment opportunities during or after graduation are the most important advantages students expect to receive from an educational program that aims to follow. The empirical section results emphasize the efficiency and performance of the master program financed by the European Social Fund. Acknowledgements. This work was possible with the financial support of the Sectoral Operational Programme for Human Resources Development 2007-2013, co-financed by the European Social Fund, under the project number POSDRU 64076.

Suggested Citation

  • Span Georgeta AncuNa & Popa Irimie Emil & Mare Codruta & Dragos Cristian, 2012. "Is Gratuitousness A Reason For Joining An Educational Master Programme In Audit? Survey Evidence Using Statistical Methods," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 722-725, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:722-725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2012/n2/109.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    student employment; free courses; European Social Fund;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:722-725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.