IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onl/ajossh/v4y2019i1p68-74id121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arbitration or Litigation: International High-Tech Business Disputes Resolutions

Author

Listed:
  • Ashraf M. A. Elfakharani
  • Rohana Abdul Rahman
  • Nor Anita Abdullah

Abstract

This paper discusses a dichotomy that arises on the issue of choosing the right dispute settlement mechanism in matters related to high-tech companies. Such disputes arise in complex issues related to Patents and IPR rights, product piracy, counterfeiting, internet and cyber security and several issues related to marketing and territorial rights of selling scientific products. These cases cannot be handled in traditional court for several reasons. Instead businesses are turning to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for instance arbitrations institutions like SVAMC that works with high-tech companies and law firms and advocate the promotion of arbitration mechanism to resolve high-tech business disputes. Other international institute such as World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) ADR in R&D and technology that has many advantages over normal litigation including low costs, very short time taken to settle disputes and predictability. This paper compares the different approaches in the traditional courts litigation system and ADR in respect of high-tech business disputes and recommends why arbitration is a more preferred method to solve high-tech disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashraf M. A. Elfakharani & Rohana Abdul Rahman & Nor Anita Abdullah, 2019. "Arbitration or Litigation: International High-Tech Business Disputes Resolutions," American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Online Science Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 68-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:onl:ajossh:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:68-74:id:121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/article/view/121/135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/article/view/121/996
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onl:ajossh:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:68-74:id:121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pacharapa Naka (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.onlinesciencepublishing.com/index.php/ajssh/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.