IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nup/jrmdke/v10y2022i2179-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation in the Book Market Retail. Preferences Among Romanian Readers

Author

Listed:
  • Adina SANIUTA

    (SNSPA)

  • Alexandra ZBUCHEA

    (SNSPA)

  • Bogdan HRIB

    (SNSPA)

Abstract

Today’s dynamic business environment forces companies to differentiate more than ever and focus on gaining long-term competitive advantages through innovation. The book market faces new challenges, mainly related to the shifting behaviour of readers. Innovation might be perceived as a path towards differentiation, attaining competitive advantage, and market success. Understanding the preferences of the readers and knowing the retail innovation trends could help all the decision-making actors of the book market adapt better to the dynamics of contemporary society and the business environment. The present paper aims at identifying the preferences of Romanian readers regarding the innovations employed in the book market retail. To gather the data, we applied an online questionnaire to a sample of 486 respondents from Romania. The main conclusion of the study underlines that the consumers are not necessarily sensitive to technological innovation or an innovative format of the stores but are highly sensitive to the atmosphere in the bookstores and to the special offers of the bookstores.

Suggested Citation

  • Adina SANIUTA & Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Bogdan HRIB, 2022. "Innovation in the Book Market Retail. Preferences Among Romanian Readers," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 10(2), pages 179-209, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:10:y:2022:i:2:179-209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/475
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/475
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michela Addis, 2016. "Understanding the Customer Journey to Create Excellent Customer Experiences in Bookshops," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(4), pages 20-36, August.
    2. Stock, Ruth & Zacharias, Nicolas, 2011. "Patterns and Performance Outcomes of Innovation Orientation," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 57122, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaida Kaduskeviciute & Sigitas Urbonavicius, 2019. "Webrooming: A Way of Dealing with Uncertainties in Purchasing," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 31(2), pages 139-152.
    2. Julia Naranjo-Valencia & Ricardo Vidal-Patiño & Gregorio Calderón-Hernández, 2019. "Characterization of Innovation Research Published in Latin American Journals Indexed in WoS," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(07), pages 1-38, November.
    3. Stefano Denicolai & Antonella Zucchella & Federico Moretti, 2018. "Not So Similar After All: Exploring The Diversity Of Strategic Orientations For Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-33, May.
    4. John Hulland & Hans Baumgartner & Keith Marion Smith, 2018. "Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 92-108, January.
    5. Bezdrob, Muamer, 2019. "Long-Term Performance Implications of Management Innovation," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 24(2), pages 210-234.
    6. Chen, Yen-Chun & Lin, Ya-Hui & Li, Po-Chien & Chen, Chung-Jen, 2022. "Understanding the interplay between competitor and alliance orientations in product innovativeness: An integrative framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Karsten Hadwich & Corina Keller, 2015. "Interne Servicequalität in Unternehmen: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Einflussfaktoren und Auswirkungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 170-205, May.
    8. Ali Murad Syed & Zahid Riaz & Abdul Waheed, 2016. "Innovation, Firm Performance And Riskiness: Evidence From The Leading Worldwide Innovative Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(07), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Theopilus Yansen & Yogasara Thedy & Theresia Clara & Ardine Dessy, 2021. "Customer experience analysis of cosmetics retail store on millennial women," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 29-45, June.
    10. Ruth Maria Stock & Nils Lennart Schnarr, 2016. "Exploring The Product Innovation Outcomes Of Corporate Culture And Executive Leadership," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-33, January.
    11. Li Zuo & Gregory J. Fisher & Zhi Yang, 2019. "Organizational learning and technological innovation: the distinct dimensions of novelty and meaningfulness that impact firm performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1166-1183, November.
    12. Pilar Fidel & Walesska Schlesinger & Esposito Emilo, 2018. "EFFECTS OF CUSTOMER KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND CUSTOMER ORIENTATION ON INNOVATION CAPACITY AND MARKETING RESULTS IN SMEs: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INNOVATION ORIENTATION," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Hua-Hung (Robin) Weng & Ja-Shen Chen & Pei-Ching Chen, 2015. "Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    14. Stefano Denicolai & Birgit Hagen & Alessia Pisoni, 2015. "Be international or be innovative? Be both? The role of the entrepreneurial profile," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 390-417, December.
    15. Yinghong Susan Wei & Hugh O’Neill & Nan Zhou, 2020. "How Does Perceived Integrity in Leadership Matter to Firms in a Transitional Economy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 623-641, December.
    16. Zacharias, Nicolas A. & Daldere, Dace & Winter, Christian G.H., 2020. "Variety is the spice of life: How much partner alignment is preferable in open innovation activities to enhance firms’ adaptiveness and innovation success?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 290-301.
    17. Andonova, Veneta & Losada-Otálora, Mauricio, 2020. "Understanding the interplay between brand and innovation orientation: Evidence from emerging multinationals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 540-552.
    18. Mohammad Jamal Khan & Sahrish Ahmad & Hasliza Abdul Halim & Noor Hazlina Ahmad, 2022. "The Effect of Service Innovation Orientation and Open Innovation on Innovation Performance of Medium and Small Private Hospitals in India," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    19. Ozlem Ozkok & Simon J. Bell & Jagdip Singh & Kwanghui Lim, 2019. "Frontline knowledge networks in open collaboration models for service innovations," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 268-288, December.
    20. Singh Rajesh & Sarangal Rajani Kumari, 2021. "Innovation in Quick Service Restaurants (QSRs): A Future Perspective," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 210-218, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:10:y:2022:i:2:179-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian-Mihai VIDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmsnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.