IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v629y2024i8010d10.1038_s41586-024-07255-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The molecular basis of sugar detection by an insect taste receptor

Author

Listed:
  • João Victor Gomes

    (Yale University School of Medicine)

  • Shivinder Singh-Bhagania

    (Yale University School of Medicine)

  • Matthew Cenci

    (Yale University School of Medicine)

  • Carlos Chacon Cordon

    (Yale University School of Medicine)

  • Manjodh Singh

    (Yale University School of Medicine)

  • Joel A. Butterwick

    (Yale University School of Medicine)

Abstract

Animals crave sugars because of their energy potential and the pleasurable sensation of tasting sweetness. Yet all sugars are not metabolically equivalent, requiring mechanisms to detect and differentiate between chemically similar sweet substances. Insects use a family of ionotropic gustatory receptors to discriminate sugars1, each of which is selectively activated by specific sweet molecules2–6. Here, to gain insight into the molecular basis of sugar selectivity, we determined structures of Gr9, a gustatory receptor from the silkworm Bombyx mori (BmGr9), in the absence and presence of its sole activating ligand, d-fructose. These structures, along with structure-guided mutagenesis and functional assays, illustrate how d-fructose is enveloped by a ligand-binding pocket that precisely matches the overall shape and pattern of chemical groups in d-fructose. However, our computational docking and experimental binding assays revealed that other sugars also bind BmGr9, yet they are unable to activate the receptor. We determined the structure of BmGr9 in complex with one such non-activating sugar, l-sorbose. Although both sugars bind a similar position, only d-fructose is capable of engaging a bridge of two conserved aromatic residues that connects the pocket to the pore helix, inducing a conformational change that allows the ion-conducting pore to open. Thus, chemical specificity does not depend solely on the selectivity of the ligand-binding pocket, but it is an emergent property arising from a combination of receptor–ligand interactions and allosteric coupling. Our results support a model whereby coarse receptor tuning is derived from the size and chemical characteristics of the pocket, whereas fine-tuning of receptor activation is achieved through the selective engagement of an allosteric pathway that regulates ion conduction.

Suggested Citation

  • João Victor Gomes & Shivinder Singh-Bhagania & Matthew Cenci & Carlos Chacon Cordon & Manjodh Singh & Joel A. Butterwick, 2024. "The molecular basis of sugar detection by an insect taste receptor," Nature, Nature, vol. 629(8010), pages 228-234, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:629:y:2024:i:8010:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07255-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07255-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07255-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-07255-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:629:y:2024:i:8010:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07255-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.